Literature DB >> 8801128

Grasping component alterations and limb transport.

D Timmann1, G E Stelmach, J R Bloedel.   

Abstract

The kinematic changes associated with the manipulation and transport components during a prehensile movement were examined using an experimental paradigm that required alterations in only the manipulation component. Instead of starting with the thumb and index finger naturally together (control condition), subjects began the reach-to-grasp movement with their thumb and fingers fully extended (experimental condition). In contrast to the control condition, in the experimental conditions the thumb and index finger started to close during wrist transport, then opened again prior to object grasp. In addition, there was a brief inflection in the ascending portion of the velocity profile of the wrist in over half the trials. However, all the primary features of the transport component profile remained unaltered. The results suggest that there can be substantial reorganization of the grip aperture during the first part of the reach without altering the temporal and spatial relationships between grip aperture and transport as the object to be grasped is approached.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8801128     DOI: 10.1007/bf00227271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  19 in total

1.  Intrahemispheric cortical connexions and visual guidance of hand and finger movements in the rhusus monkey.

Authors:  R Haaxma; H G Kuypers
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  A model for the generation of movements requiring endpoint precision.

Authors:  T E Milner
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Remote responses to perturbation in human prehension.

Authors:  P Haggard; A M Wing
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1991-01-14       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Orienting the finger opposition space during prehension movements.

Authors:  G E Stelmach; U Castiello; M Jeannerod
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension.

Authors:  L S Jakobson; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Effects of posterior parietal lesions on visually guided behavior in monkeys.

Authors:  S Faugier-Grimaud; C Frenois; D G Stein
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  The coupling of arm and finger movements during prehension.

Authors:  Y Paulignan; C MacKenzie; R Marteniuk; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories.

Authors:  R G Marteniuk; C L MacKenzie; M Jeannerod; S Athenes; C Dugas
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1987-09

9.  Coordination between the transport and the grasp components during prehension movements.

Authors:  S Chieffi; M Gentilucci
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Reach to grasp: the natural response to perturbation of object size.

Authors:  U Castiello; K M Bennett; G E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  12 in total

1.  Effects of accuracy constraints on reach-to-grasp movements in cerebellar patients.

Authors:  M K Rand; Y Shimansky; G E Stelmach; V Bracha; J R Bloedel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Adaptation of reach-to-grasp movement in response to force perturbations.

Authors:  M K Rand; Y Shimansky; G E Stelmach; J R Bloedel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Can the motor system resolve a premovement bias in grip aperture? Online analysis of grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Christina Rival; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Validity of the speed-accuracy tradeoff for prehension movements.

Authors:  M Girgenrath; O Bock; S Jüngling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Hand shaping using hapsis resembles visually guided hand shaping.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Lori-Ann R Sacrey; Jon B Doan; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Müller-Lyer figures influence the online reorganization of visually guided grasping movements.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Christina Rival; Kristina Neely; Olav Krigolson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Frame-by-Frame Video Analysis of Idiosyncratic Reach-to-Grasp Movements in Humans.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Jessica R Kuntz; Layne A Lenhart; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  On the relation between action selection and movement control in 5- to 9-month-old infants.

Authors:  Margot van Wermeskerken; John van der Kamp; Geert J P Savelsbergh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Grip reorganization during wrist transport: the influence of an altered aperture.

Authors:  M Saling; S Mescheriakov; E Molokanova; G E Stelmach; M Berger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Effects of altered transport paths and intermediate movement goals on human grasp kinematics.

Authors:  Constanze Hesse; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.