Literature DB >> 22357103

Grip type and task goal modify reach-to-grasp performance in post-stroke hemiparesis.

Sydney Y Schaefer1, Stacey L DeJong, Kendra M Cherry, Catherine E Lang.   

Abstract

This study investigated whether grip type and/or task goal influenced reaching and grasping performance in poststroke hemiparesis. Sixteen adults with poststroke hemiparesis and twelve healthy adults reached to and grasped a cylindrical object using one of two grip types (3-finger or palmar) to achieve one of two task goals (hold or lift). Performance of the stroke group was characteristic of hemiparetic limb movement during reach-to-grasp, with more curved handpaths and slower velocities compared with the control group. These effects were present regardless of grip type or task goal. Other measures of reaching (reach time and reach velocity at object contact) and grasping (peak thumb-index finger aperture during the reach and peak grip force during the grasp) were differentially affected by grip type, task goal, or both, despite the presence of hemiparesis, providing new evidence that changes in motor patterns after stroke may occur to compensate for stroke-related motor impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22357103      PMCID: PMC3358536          DOI: 10.1123/mcj.16.2.245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Motor Control        ISSN: 1087-1640            Impact factor:   1.422


  103 in total

1.  The effects of precision demands during a low intensity pinching task on muscle activation and load sharing of the fingers.

Authors:  Bart Visser; Michiel P de Looze; DirkJan H E J Veeger; Marjolein Douwes; Liesbeth Groenesteijn; Elsbeth de Korte; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.368

2.  The timing of natural prehension movements.

Authors:  M Jeannerod
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Precision grasps of children and young and old adults: individual differences in digit contact strategy, purchase pattern, and digit posture.

Authors:  Yvonne J Wong; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Kinetic and kinematic workspaces of the index finger following stroke.

Authors:  E G Cruz; H C Waldinger; D G Kamper
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 5.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand.

Authors:  Ge Wu; Frans C T van der Helm; H E J DirkJan Veeger; Mohsen Makhsous; Peter Van Roy; Carolyn Anglin; Jochem Nagels; Andrew R Karduna; Kevin McQuade; Xuguang Wang; Frederick W Werner; Bryan Buchholz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 6.  What do motor "recovery" and "compensation" mean in patients following stroke?

Authors:  Mindy F Levin; Jeffrey A Kleim; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 3.919

7.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories.

Authors:  R G Marteniuk; C L MacKenzie; M Jeannerod; S Athenes; C Dugas
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1987-09

8.  The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale in chronic stroke patients.

Authors:  J H van der Lee; H Beckerman; G J Lankhorst; L M Bouter
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Grip aperture scaling to object size in chronic stroke.

Authors:  Stella Maris Michaelsen; Eliane C Magdalon; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.422

10.  Sensorimotor impairments and reaching performance in subjects with poststroke hemiparesis during the first few months of recovery.

Authors:  Joanne M Wagner; Catherine E Lang; Shirley A Sahrmann; Dorothy F Edwards; Alexander W Dromerick
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2007-04-18
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Motor compensation and its effects on neural reorganization after stroke.

Authors:  Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Testing the concurrent validity of a naturalistic upper extremity reaching task.

Authors:  S Y Schaefer; C R Hengge
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Characterization of normative hand movements during two functional upper limb tasks.

Authors:  Aïda M Valevicius; Quinn A Boser; Ewen B Lavoie; Glyn S Murgatroyd; Patrick M Pilarski; Craig S Chapman; Albert H Vette; Jacqueline S Hebert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The effects of an object's height and weight on force calibration and kinematics when post-stroke and healthy individuals reach and grasp.

Authors:  Ronit Feingold-Polak; Anna Yelkin; Shmil Edelman; Amir Shapiro; Shelly Levy-Tzedek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Indexes for motor performance assessment in job integration/reintegration of people with neuromuscular disorders: A systematic review.

Authors:  Giorgia Chini; Lorenzo Fiori; Antonella Tatarelli; Tiwana Varrecchia; Francesco Draicchio; Alberto Ranavolo
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 6.  Neurostimulation and Reach-to-Grasp Function Recovery Following Acquired Brain Injury: Insight From Pre-clinical Rodent Models and Human Applications.

Authors:  Charles-Francois V Latchoumane; Deborah A Barany; Lohitash Karumbaiah; Tarkeshwar Singh
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Targeted Engagement of the Action Selection Network during Task-Oriented Arm Training after Stroke.

Authors:  Jill Campbell Stewart; Kaci Handlery; Jessica F Baird; Erika L Blanck; Geetanjali Pathak; Stacy L Fritz
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.599

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.