Literature DB >> 8801129

Grip reorganization during wrist transport: the influence of an altered aperture.

M Saling1, S Mescheriakov, E Molokanova, G E Stelmach, M Berger.   

Abstract

Past studies have examined the coupling of reach and grasp components during prehensile movements. Many of these studies have supported the view that these components reflect the output of two parallel, though temporally coupled, motor programs. When the grip aperture is Altered prior to the onset of prehension from its usual, normally flexed position to one of maximal finger extension, our previous work has shown that the grasp component appears to reorganize itself during the reach. This reorganization, consisting of a brief closing and reopening of the grip aperture, only slightly influenced the temporal components of the wrist transport. The present experiment continues this research theme by examining the characteristics of grip aperture reorganization through the comparison of the kinematics of prehension components during movements to two different size objects under normal and Altered grip aperture conditions. It was hypothesized that if the grip reorganization is task dependent it should be related to object size. The experiment found that in the Altered grip condition reorganization did occur, as indicated by a slight closing and reopening of the aperture without influencing the transport of the wrist. The amplitude of and the time to the observed inflection point in the aperture time course were related to object size. The velocity of grip closing for the large object showed double peaks, with the first substantially smaller than the second. Moreover, for the small object, the velocity of grip aperture closing also was double peaked, but the difference between peaks was less pronounced. These changes in grip velocity suggest that the grip reorganization is related to object size. No effect of Altered aperture was observed on the transport component. For both object sizes in the Altered condition, the final peak velocity of grip aperture was statistically significantly correlated with transport time and time to peak deceleration. In contrast, such correlations were not observed for the initial peak velocity of the grip aperture. Furthermore, time to maximum grip aperture was correlated with both time to peak wrist velocity and time peak to wrist deceleration. Thus, as the reach progressed toward the object, the grip and transport components became more interdependent. The results are consistent with the notion that, when a well-practiced, coordinated act such as prehension is confronted with an Altered grip posture at the onset of the reach, the grip can be reorganized during the transport to preserve the relative timing between them. Thus these data add to the growing awareness that not only is there temporal coupling between the reach and grasp components but that these components may be integrated by higher-order control mechanism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8801129     DOI: 10.1007/bf00227272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  21 in total

1.  Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching.

Authors:  A M Wing; A Turton; C Fraser
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Temporal constraints in the control of prehensile movement.

Authors:  S A Wallace; D L Weeks
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Orienting the finger opposition space during prehension movements.

Authors:  G E Stelmach; U Castiello; M Jeannerod
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 1.328

4.  Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: a kinematic analysis of human prehension.

Authors:  L S Jakobson; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements.

Authors:  M Gentilucci; U Castiello; M L Corradini; M Scarpa; C Umiltà; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  The coupling of arm and finger movements during prehension.

Authors:  Y Paulignan; C MacKenzie; R Marteniuk; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Temporal dissociation of the prehension pattern in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  U Castiello; G E Stelmach; A N Lieberman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Reach to grasp: the natural response to perturbation of object size.

Authors:  U Castiello; K M Bennett; G E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Corticospinal neurons with a special role in precision grip.

Authors:  R B Muir; R N Lemon
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1983-02-21       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Schemas for the temporal organization of behaviour.

Authors:  M A Arbib
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1985
View more
  19 in total

1.  Effects of accuracy constraints on reach-to-grasp movements in cerebellar patients.

Authors:  M K Rand; Y Shimansky; G E Stelmach; V Bracha; J R Bloedel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Adaptation of reach-to-grasp movement in response to force perturbations.

Authors:  M K Rand; Y Shimansky; G E Stelmach; J R Bloedel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Can the motor system resolve a premovement bias in grip aperture? Online analysis of grasping the Müller-Lyer illusion.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Christina Rival; Gordon Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Validity of the speed-accuracy tradeoff for prehension movements.

Authors:  M Girgenrath; O Bock; S Jüngling
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Hand shaping using hapsis resembles visually guided hand shaping.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Lori-Ann R Sacrey; Jon B Doan; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Müller-Lyer figures influence the online reorganization of visually guided grasping movements.

Authors:  Matthew Heath; Christina Rival; Kristina Neely; Olav Krigolson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Palmar arch dynamics during reach-to-grasp tasks.

Authors:  Archana P Sangole; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Quantitative model of transport-aperture coordination during reach-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; Y P Shimansky; Abul B M I Hossain; George E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Reach-to-grasp movement as a minimization process.

Authors:  Fang Yang; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Dissociation of the Reach and the Grasp in the destriate (V1) monkey Helen: a new anatomy for the dual visuomotor channel theory of reaching.

Authors:  Ian Q Whishaw; Jenni M Karl; Nicholas K Humphrey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.