Literature DB >> 8836690

Integrated control of hand transport and orientation during prehension movements.

M Desmurget1, C Prablanc, M Arzi, Y Rossetti, Y Paulignan, C Urquizar.   

Abstract

At a descriptive level, prehension movements can be partitioned into three components ensuring, respectively, the transport of the arm to the vicinity of the target, the orientation of the hand according to object tilt, and the grasp itself. Several authors have suggested that this analytic description may be an operational principle for the organization of the motor system. This hypothesis, called "visuomotor channels hypothesis," is in particular supported by experiments showing a parallelism between the reach and grasp components of prehension movements. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether or not the generalization of the visuomotor channels hypothesis, from its initial form, restricted to the grasp and transport components, to its actual form, including the reach orientation and grasp components, may be well founded. Six subjects were required to reach and grasp cylindrical objects presented at a given location, with different orientations. During the movements, object orientation was either kept constant (unperturbed trials) or modified at movement onset (perturbed trials). Results showed that both wrist path (sequence of positions that the hand follows in space), and wrist trajectory (time sequence of the successive positions of the hand) were strongly affected by object orientation and by the occurrence of perturbations. These observations suggested strongly that arm transport and hand orientation were neither planned nor controlled independently. The significant linear regressions observed, with respect to the time, between arm displacement (integral of the magnitude of the velocity vector) and forearm rotation also supported this view. Interestingly, hand orientation was not implemented at only the distal level, demonstrating that all the redundant degrees of freedom available were used by the motor system to achieve the task. The final configuration reached by the arm was very stable for a given final orientation of the object to grasp. In particular, when object tilt was suddenly modified at movement onset, the correction brought the upper limb into the same posture as that obtained when the object was initially presented along the final orientation reached after perturbation. Taken together, the results described in the present study suggest that arm transport and hand orientation do not constitute independent visuomotor channels. They also further suggest that prehension movements are programmed, from an initial configuration, to reach smoothly a final posture that corresponds to a given "location and orientation" as a whole.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8836690     DOI: 10.1007/bf00228557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  54 in total

1.  Effects of Object Texture on Precontact Movement Time in Human Prehension.

Authors:  T. G. Fikes; R. L. Klatzky; S. J. Lederman
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Remote responses to perturbation in human prehension.

Authors:  P Haggard; A M Wing
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1991-01-14       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements.

Authors:  M Gentilucci; U Castiello; M L Corradini; M Scarpa; C Umiltà; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. II. Area F5 and the control of distal movements.

Authors:  G Rizzolatti; R Camarda; L Fogassi; M Gentilucci; G Luppino; M Matelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Postural and synergic control for three-dimensional movements of reaching and grasping.

Authors:  M Desmurget; C Prablanc; Y Rossetti; M Arzi; Y Paulignan; C Urquizar; J C Mignot
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Impairment of grasping movements following a bilateral posterior parietal lesion.

Authors:  M Jeannerod; J Decety; F Michel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Coordination of arm and wrist motion during a reaching task.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; J F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movement.

Authors:  M J Hollerbach; T Flash
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  The distribution of muscular weakness in upper motor neuron lesions affecting the arm.

Authors:  J G Colebatch; S C Gandevia
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  32 in total

1.  A simple rule for controlling overarm throws to different targets.

Authors:  Sherry Watts; Ivan Pessotto; Jon Hore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Hand shaping using hapsis resembles visually guided hand shaping.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Lori-Ann R Sacrey; Jon B Doan; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Selection of wrist posture in conditions of motor ambiguity.

Authors:  Daniel K Wood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Spatiotemporal distribution of location and object effects in reach-to-grasp kinematics.

Authors:  Adam G Rouse; Marc H Schieber
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Control of hand orientation and arm movement during reach and grasp.

Authors:  Jing Fan; Jiping He; Stephen I Helms Tillery
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Control of aperture closure during reach-to-grasp movements in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  M K Rand; A L Smiley-Oyen; Y P Shimansky; J R Bloedel; G E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Coordination and concurrency in bimanual rotation tasks when moving away from and toward the body.

Authors:  A H Mason; P J Bryden
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Hand orientation during reach-to-grasp movements modulates neuronal activity in the medial posterior parietal area V6A.

Authors:  Patrizia Fattori; Rossella Breveglieri; Nicoletta Marzocchi; Daniela Filippini; Annalisa Bosco; Claudio Galletti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Palmar arch dynamics during reach-to-grasp tasks.

Authors:  Archana P Sangole; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Role of the medial parieto-occipital cortex in the control of reaching and grasping movements.

Authors:  Claudio Galletti; Dieter F Kutz; Michela Gamberini; Rossella Breveglieri; Patrizia Fattori
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-27       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.