Literature DB >> 2376113

SLAM: a connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks.

R H Phaf1, A H Van der Heijden, P T Hudson.   

Abstract

SLAM, the SeLective Attention Model, performs visual selective attention tasks, an analysis of which shows that two processes, object and attribute selection, are both necessary and sufficient. It is based upon the McClelland and Rumelhart (1981) model for visual word recognition, with the addition of a response selection and evaluation mechanism. The responses may be correct or incorrect and, in particular conditions, SLAM may not make a response at all. Moreover, it allows for the generation of specific responses in time. SLAM's main characteristics are parallelism restricted by competition within modules, heterarchical processing in a hierarchical structure, and generation of responses as a result of relaxation given the conjoint constraints of stimulation, object, and attribute selection. The model is considered to represent an individual subject performing filtering tasks and demonstrates appropriate selective behavior. It is also tested quantitatively using a single tentative set of model parameters. The study reports simulations of four different filtering experiments, modeling response latencies, and error proportions. Specifications are made to take account of instructions, previous trials, and the effect of a barmarker cue and of asynchronies in stimulus and cue onsets. The model is then extended in order to provide simulations of a number of Stroop experiments, which can be regarded as filtering tasks with nonequivalent stimuli. The extension required for Stroop simulations is the addition of direct connections between compatible stimulus and response aspects. The direct connections do not affect the simulation of simpler filtering tasks. A variety of different experiments carried out by different authors is simulated. The model is discussed in terms of how modular architecture and the interaction of excitation and inhibition generate facilitation or inhibition of response latencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2376113     DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(90)90006-p

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  33 in total

1.  Cued visual attention does not distinguish between occluded and occluding objects.

Authors:  C Haimson; M Behrmann
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

2.  Form-based priming in spoken word recognition: the roles of competition and bias.

Authors:  S D Goldinger; P A Luce; D B Pisoni; J K Marcario
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words.

Authors:  J Tzelgov; A Henik; J Berger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-11

4.  Measuring the allocation of attention in the Stroop task: evidence from eye movement patterns.

Authors:  Bettina Olk
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-12-29

5.  Good vibrations switch attention: an affective function for network oscillations in evolutionary simulations.

Authors:  Bram T Heerebout; R Hans Phaf
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Novel Symbol Learning-Induced Stroop Effect: Evidence for a Strategy-Based, Utility Learning Model.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Huijun Tang; Yuan Deng
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-10

7.  Neurodevelopmental effects of early deprivation in postinstitutionalized children.

Authors:  Seth D Pollak; Charles A Nelson; Mary F Schlaak; Barbara J Roeber; Sandi S Wewerka; Kristen L Wiik; Kristin A Frenn; Michelle M Loman; Megan R Gunnar
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb

8.  The role of response mechanisms in determining reaction time performance: Piéron's law revisited.

Authors:  Tom Stafford; Kevin N Gurney
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-12

9.  Automatic activation of task-related representations in task shifting.

Authors:  Marco Steinhauser; Ronald Hübner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-01

10.  Biologically constrained action selection improves cognitive control in a model of the Stroop task.

Authors:  Tom Stafford; Kevin N Gurney
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.