Literature DB >> 6218237

Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon.

M O Glaser, W R Glaser.   

Abstract

Dyer (1971) investigated the response competition hypothesis of the Stroop phenomenon by temporally separating the color and word components of single stimuli (incongruent, control, and congruent). This line of research was continued in a series of five experiments that generalized Dyer's study: (a) In addition to the color-naming task, a reading task was included; (b) the irrelevant stimulus component was presented before and after the relevant one; (c) the probabilities of congruent and incongruent stimuli were varied; (d) besides color-word/color stimuli, color-color and word-word stimuli were used; and (e) the functional discrimination (color naming or reading) was compared with a sequential discrimination task. The data suggest the following temporal relations: (a) a slow facilitation due to response bias; (b) its inhibitory counterpart; and (c) a fast, strong inhibition with no facilitatory complement that seems to correspond to the usual Stroop conflict but that seems to occur earlier than the response execution stage.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6218237     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.8.6.875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  62 in total

1.  Naming the color of a word: is it responses or task sets that compete?

Authors:  S Monsell; T J Taylor; K Murphy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-01

2.  The importance of irrelevant-dimension variability in the stroop flanker task.

Authors:  Sharon Morein-Zamir; Avishai Henik; Idit Spitzer-Davidson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-03

3.  Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks.

Authors:  Markus F Damian; Jeffrey S Bowers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

4.  Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words.

Authors:  J Tzelgov; A Henik; J Berger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-11

5.  Selective attention to pitch amid conflicting auditory information: context-coding and filtering strategies.

Authors:  Blas Espinoza-Varas; Hyunsook Jang
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-07-17

6.  Stroop matching task: role of feature selection and temporal modulation.

Authors:  Isabel A David; Eliane Volchan; Jaime Vila; Andreas Keil; Letícia de Oliveira; Aydamari J P Faria-Júnior; Pandelis Perakakis; Elisa C Dias; Izabela Mocaiber; Mirtes G Pereira; Walter Machado-Pinheiro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Race-specific perceptual discrimination improvement following short individuation training with faces.

Authors:  Rankin W McGugin; James W Tanaka; Sophie Lebrecht; Michael J Tarr; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-11-08

8.  Attention dysfunction in cirrhotic patients: an inquiry on the role of executive control, attention orienting and focusing.

Authors:  Piero Amodio; Sami Schiff; Franco Del Piccolo; Daniela Mapelli; Angelo Gatta; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.584

9.  Biologically constrained action selection improves cognitive control in a model of the Stroop task.

Authors:  Tom Stafford; Kevin N Gurney
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.

Authors:  C H Lu; R W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.