Literature DB >> 1423088

Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years.

A B Miller1, C J Baines, T To, C Wall.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of annual mammography over and above annual physical examination of the breasts and the teaching of breast self-examination among women aged 50 to 59 on entry.
DESIGN: Individually randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Fifteen urban centres in Canada with expertise in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. PARTICIPANTS: Women with no history of breast cancer and no mammography in the previous 12 months were randomly assigned to undergo either annual mammography and physical examination (MP group) or annual physical examination only (PO group). The 39,405 women enrolled from January 1980 through March 1985 were followed for a mean of 8.3 years. DATA COLLECTION: Derived from the participants by initial and annual self-administered questionnaires, from the screening examinations, from the patients' physicians, from the provincial cancer registries and by record linkage to the Canadian National Mortality Data Base. Expert panels evaluated histologic and death data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of referral from screening, rates of detection of breast cancer from screening and from community care, nodal status, tumour size and rates of death from all causes and from breast cancer.
RESULTS: Over 85% of the women in each group attended the screening sessions after screen 1. The characteristics of the women in the two groups were similar. Compared with the Canadian population the participants were more likely to be married, have fewer children, have more education, be in a professional occupation, smoke less and have been born in North America. The rate of screen-detected breast cancer on first examination was 7.20 per 1000 in the MP group and 3.45 per 1000 in the PO group, more node-positive tumours were found in the MP group than in the PO group. At subsequent screens the detection rates were a little less than half the rates at screen 1. During years 2 through 5 the ratios of observed to expected cases of invasive breast cancer were 1.28 in the MP group and 1.18 in the PO group. Of the women with invasive breast cancer through to 7 years, 217 in the MP group and 184 in the PO group had no node involvement, 66 and 56 had one to three nodes involved, 32 and 34 had four or more nodes involved, and 55 and 46 had an unknown nodal status. There were 38 deaths from breast cancer in the MP group and 39 in the PO group. The ratio of the proportions of death from breast cancer in the MP group compared with those in the UC group was 0.97 (95% confidence interval 0.62 to 1.52). The survival rates were similar in the two groups. Women whose cancer had been detected by mammography alone had the highest survival rate.
CONCLUSION: The study was internally valid, and there was no evidence of randomization bias. Screening with yearly mammography in addition to physical examination of the breasts detected considerably more node-negative, small tumours than screening with physical examination alone, but it had no impact on the rate of death from breast cancer up to 7 years' follow-up from entry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1423088      PMCID: PMC1336544     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  21 in total

1.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study: assessment of technical quality by external review.

Authors:  C J Baines; A B Miller; D B Kopans; M Moskowitz; D E Sanders; E A Sickles; T To; C Wall
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  The politics of mammography.

Authors:  R McLelland; E D Pisano
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  A case-control study of the efficacy of a non-randomized breast cancer screening program in Florence (Italy).

Authors:  D Palli; M R Del Turco; E Buiatti; S Carli; S Ciatto; L Toscani; G Maltoni
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1986-10-15       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Periodic breast cancer screening in reducing mortality from breast cancer.

Authors:  S Shapiro; P Strax; L Venet
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1971-03-15       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Sensitivity and specificity of first screen mammography in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: a preliminary report from five centers.

Authors:  C J Baines; A B Miller; C Wall; D V McFarlane; I S Simor; R Jong; B J Shapiro; L Audet; M Petitclerc; D Ouimet-Oliva
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Evaluation of screening for breast cancer in a non-randomised study (the DOM project) by means of a case-control study.

Authors:  H J Collette; N E Day; J J Rombach; F de Waard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-06-02       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Sensitivity and specificity of first screen mammography in 15 NBSS centres.

Authors:  C J Baines; D V McFarlane; A B Miller
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.248

8.  Impediments to recruitment in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: response and resolution.

Authors:  C J Baines
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1984-06

9.  Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial.

Authors:  I Andersson; K Aspegren; L Janzon; T Landberg; K Lindholm; F Linell; O Ljungberg; J Ranstam; B Sigfússon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-15

10.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  80 in total

1.  Predictors of mammography use among Canadian women aged 50-69: findings from the 1996/97 National Population Health Survey.

Authors:  C J Maxwell; C M Bancej; J Snider
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Organized breast cancer screening programs in Canada.

Authors:  A B Miller
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-10-31       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Breast self-examination.

Authors:  Leo Mahoney
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Does mammography save lives?

Authors:  John Hoey
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Clinical practice. Mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne W Fletcher; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Cost-effectiveness of clinical breast assessment-based screening in rural Egypt.

Authors:  Adel Denewer; Osama Hussein; Omar Farouk; Waleed Elnahas; Ashraf Khater; Aiman El-Saed
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Enthusiasm or uncertainty: small area variations in the use of mammography services in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  V Goel; K Iron; J I Williams
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  The influence of breast self-examination on subsequent mammography participation.

Authors:  Susan E Jelinski; Colleen J Maxwell; Jay Onysko; Christina M Bancej
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Generalizability of relative risk estimates from a well-defined population to a general population.

Authors:  Motoki Iwasaki; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Tetsuya Otani; Manami Inoue; Tomoyuki Hanaoka; Tomotaka Sobue; Shoichiro Tsugane
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  MLE and Bayesian inference of age-dependent sensitivity and transition probability in periodic screening.

Authors:  Dongfeng Wu; Gary L Rosner; Lyle Broemeling
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.