Literature DB >> 3060219

Sensitivity and specificity of first screen mammography in 15 NBSS centres.

C J Baines1, D V McFarlane, A B Miller.   

Abstract

We report the sensitivity and specificity of first screen mammography in a 15-centre randomized screening trial. Of 44,718 women who received mammography and physical examination at first screening, 238 were diagnosed with breast cancer at first screen, 34 in the 12-month interval after the first screen, and 98 at the second screen. Seventeen of the interval cases and 47 of the second-year cancers were defined as potentially detectable at first screening. Interpretations of first screen mammograms by radiologists at the screening centres were matched to known histological outcomes. Simultaneous blind review of 2908 cases, which included all cancers detected at first and second screenings as well as interval cancers, was done by a single reference radiologist. The sensitivity of the technique as carried out at all NBSS centres was 0.75, the specificity 0.94, the positive predictive value 0.07, and the negative predictive value 0.998.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3060219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J        ISSN: 0846-5371            Impact factor:   2.248


  8 in total

Review 1.  Cancer screening in renal transplant recipients: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Germaine Wong; Jeremy R Chapman; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: opportunity for a rethink.

Authors:  A S Basinski
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The costs and effects of cervical and breast cancer screening in a public hospital emergency room. The Cancer Control Center of Harlem.

Authors:  J Mandelblatt; H Freeman; D Winczewski; K Cagney; S Williams; R Trowers; J Tang; K Gold; T H Lin; J Kerner
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The danger of applying uniform clinical policies across populations: the case of breast cancer in American Indians.

Authors:  P A Nutting; B N Calonge; D C Iverson; L A Green
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.

Authors:  A B Miller; C J Baines; T To; C Wall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years.

Authors:  A B Miller; C J Baines; T To; C Wall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-04

8.  Rational and irrational issues in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Cornelia J Baines
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 6.639

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.