Literature DB >> 6744885

Impediments to recruitment in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: response and resolution.

C J Baines.   

Abstract

Eighteen months after the 1980 initiation of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study (NBSS) (a multicenter randomized controlled trial that will involve 90,000 women), the Toronto center experience such severe problems with recruitment that the study as a whole was jeopardized. Impediments to recruitment arose in five areas. The design of the protocol was criticized by some physicians and participants, a problem that could only be met by justifying the design. A second problem was a lack of understanding of the concept of screening and mistaken assumptions about what participation in the NBSS entailed. Thirdly, recruitment problems occurred at a time when the media were focusing much attention on the hazards of low-level ionizing radiation. Fourthly, women were found to have a variety of personal reasons for delaying or avoiding entry into the study. Finally, factors characteristic of the Canadian milieu such as universal health coverage may have acted as a disincentive to entry. To improve physician understanding, NBSS personnel made presentations at medical rounds and scientific meetings; articles were written for medical journals. To win support from the lay public, talks were given to recreation or work-based groups. Appearances on radio and television talk shows were sought out. Mass mailings to university staff and professional associations did not produce large responses, nor did advertisements on television, radio, or in newspapers. The distribution of a check insert in a government mailing gave rise to hundreds of appointments across Canada. However, for generating an ongoing adequate level of recruitment, the best measure has been the mailing of personally addressed letters to eligible women followed by a telephone call. Data on response rates, cost and women's attitudes toward the study are reported. By early 1983, Toronto met its recruitment target of 12,000.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6744885     DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(84)90119-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  18 in total

Review 1.  Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  J Ringash
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Increasing participation of minorities in cancer clinical trials: summary of the "Moving Beyond the Barriers" Conference in North Carolina.

Authors:  Nancy Stark; Electra Paskett; Ronny Bell; M Robert Cooper; Elizabeth Walker; Alma Wilson; Cathy Tatum
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Designing clinical protocols for optimal use: measuring attributes of treatment and cancer control trials.

Authors:  J E Veney; W P Kory; J M Barnsley; A D Kaluzny
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Minority recruitment into clinical trials: experimental findings and practical implications.

Authors:  Susan D Brown; Katherine Lee; Danielle E Schoffman; Abby C King; Lavera M Crawley; Michaela Kiernan
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  The impact of reminder letters on attendance for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  C Hayes; B O'Herlihy; M Hynes; Z Johnson
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1999 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  C J Baines
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Evaluation of a mass mailing recruitment strategy to obtain a community sample of women for a clinical trial of an incontinence prevention intervention.

Authors:  Kassandra L Messer; A Regula Herzog; Julia S Seng; Carolyn M Sampselle; Ananias C Diokno; T E Raghunathan; Sandra H Hines
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 8.  Strategies for increasing recruitment to randomised controlled trials: systematic review.

Authors:  Patrina H Y Caldwell; Sana Hamilton; Alvin Tan; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.

Authors:  A B Miller; C J Baines; T To; C Wall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years.

Authors:  A B Miller; C J Baines; T To; C Wall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.