Literature DB >> 9328542

Enthusiasm or uncertainty: small area variations in the use of mammography services in Ontario, Canada.

V Goel1, K Iron, J I Williams.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To examine the variation in mammography utilisation in relation to age group and indication across health planning regions in Ontario, Canada.
DESIGN: This study includes all women aged 30 and over in Ontario who received a mammogram between July 1, 1990 and December 31, 1991. Data from a sample of 10,000 women aged 50-69 were used to assign mammogram indication as "screening", "possible diagnostic", or "probable diagnostic" based on previous health care utilisation patterns. Age specific rates and age adjusted rates in relation to age group (30-39, 40-49, 50-69, and 70 + years) and region were derived. MAIN
RESULTS: Overall, 572,762 women received one or more mammograms. Rates increased from 30-54 years and decreased thereafter. Similar variations were seen in the 40-49 and 50-69 age groups. The ranking in the area specific rates remained consistent for all ages except the 30-39 year range. In relation to indication, the largest variation across regions occurred in the screening group.
CONCLUSIONS: Mammography utilisation varies across age groups. The greatest variability is for screening, probably because of physician referral patterns, patient uptake, and perhaps access to mammography. The extent of variation was similar when compared between groups where recommendations were consistent (ages 50-59) and where they were inconsistent (ages 40-49) suggesting that perhaps enthusiasm rather than uncertainty is related to regional variation for this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9328542      PMCID: PMC1060504          DOI: 10.1136/jech.51.4.378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  21 in total

Review 1.  Reduced breast-cancer mortality with mammography screening--an assessment of currently available data.

Authors:  L E Rutqvist; A B Miller; I Andersson; M Hakama; T Hakulinen; B F Sigfússon; L Tabár
Journal:  Int J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1990

2.  Mail versus telephone surveys on mammography utilization among women 50-75 years old.

Authors:  A P Polednak; D S Lane; M A Burg
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  What is too much variation? The null hypothesis in small-area analysis.

Authors:  P Diehr; K Cain; F Connell; E Volinn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  The use of proxies in health surveys. Substantive and policy implications.

Authors:  R R Mosely; F D Wolinsky
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Breast cancer screening by mammography: utilization and associated factors.

Authors:  J G Zapka; A M Stoddard; M E Costanza; H L Greene
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Hospital information system and patterns of cancer screening.

Authors:  K Nasseri; R Bastani; S Bernstein; L Breslow
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.460

7.  Repeat mammography among women over 50 years of age.

Authors:  H L Howe
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.

Authors:  A B Miller; C J Baines; T To; C Wall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 9.  Guidelines for screening for breast cancer. Is a revision in order?

Authors:  M Moskowitz
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Measuring the use of mammography: two methods compared.

Authors:  D Degnan; R Harris; J Ranney; D Quade; J A Earp; J Gonzalez
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  4 in total

1.  Determining use of preventive health care in Ontario: comparison of rates of 3 maneuvers in administrative and survey data.

Authors:  Li Wang; X Nie Jason; Ross E G Upshur
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Geographical variation in radiological services: a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Kristin Bakke Lysdahl; Ingelin Børretzen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Factors influencing mammography participation in Canada: an integrative review of the literature.

Authors:  K Hanson; P Montgomery; D Bakker; M Conlon
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Health Care Utilization by Canadian Women.

Authors:  Arminée Kazanjian; Denise Morettin; Robert Cho
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2004-08-25       Impact factor: 2.809

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.