Literature DB >> 1422969

Reproducibility of lateral spine scans using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

T A Larnach1, S J Boyd, R C Smart, S P Butler, P G Rohl, T H Diamond.   

Abstract

Reproducibility of lateral spine dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (LAT DEXA) scans using a Lunar DPX-L scanner was assessed in a cadaveric phantom and in patients. One hundred phantom measurements over 7 months demonstrated a longitudinal stability of 1.7% (coefficient of variation, CV). Additional scans were performed with the phantom rotated by up to 20 degrees in each of the three orthogonal planes to assess the effects of variable patient positioning. Horizontal and vertical rotation of the spine had little effect on the estimated bone mineral density (BMD), however, axial rotation of greater than 8 degrees led to errors in the BMD measurement. One hundred consecutive patients had two lateral scans performed within 1 month. BMD (range 0.10-1.6 g/cm2) was determined for each scan by one operator. Significant overlap from ribs and pelvis was often seen with L2 and L4 vertebrae but one vertebra (L3) could be measured in every case. Intraoperator and interoperator variability was assessed by three experienced operators, each analyzing 10 patients' scans on five separate occasions, and was found to be less than 1.1% for a single vertebra. BMD estimation of vertebral bodies and midslices by lateral DEXA scans (CV% of 3.8% and 4.6%) have a 95% confidence interval of 0.074 g/cm2 and 0.096 g/cm2, respectively for two vertebrae. This variability is due mainly to axial rotation, with operator variability, horizontal rotation, and vertical rotation having little effect on BMD estimation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1422969     DOI: 10.1007/bf00334484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  6 in total

1.  Limited precision of lumbar spine dual-photon absorptiometry by variations in the soft-tissue background.

Authors:  R Valkema; L F Verheij; J A Blokland; A H Zwinderman; O L Bijvoet; S E Papapoulos; E K Pauwels
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Lateral dual-photon absorptiometry: a new technique to measure the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine.

Authors:  D Uebelhart; F Duboeuf; P J Meunier; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Lateral dual energy radiography: a new method for measuring vertebral bone density: a preliminary study.

Authors:  R Rupich; R Pacifici; M Griffin; I Vered; N Susman; L V Avioli
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Precision and sensitivity of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosis.

Authors:  J M Pouilles; F Tremollieres; N Todorovsky; C Ribot
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Dual-photon bone densitometry in normal Australian women: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  N A Pocock; S Eberl; J A Eisman; M G Yeates; P N Sambrook; J Freund; A Duncan
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1987-03-16       Impact factor: 7.738

6.  Long-term precision of dual photon absorptiometry in the lumbar spine in clinical settings.

Authors:  L Nilas; C Hassager; C Christiansen
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1988-03
  6 in total
  15 in total

Review 1.  Bone imaging: traditional techniques and their interpretation.

Authors:  Holger F Boehm; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  A longitudinal study of supine lateral DXA of the lumbar spine: a comparison with posteroanterior spine, hip and total-body DXA.

Authors:  G M Blake; R J Herd; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  The accuracy of volumetric bone density measurements in dual x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  M A Sabin; G M Blake; S M MacLaughlin-Black; I Fogelman
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Age changes of spine density in posterior-anterior and lateral projections in normal women.

Authors:  R B Mazess; H S Barden; R W Eberle; M D Denton
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Radiofrequency echographic multispectrometry compared with dual X-ray absorptiometry for osteoporosis diagnosis on lumbar spine and femoral neck.

Authors:  M Di Paola; D Gatti; O Viapiana; L Cianferotti; L Cavalli; C Caffarelli; F Conversano; E Quarta; P Pisani; G Girasole; A Giusti; M Manfredini; G Arioli; M Matucci-Cerinic; G Bianchi; R Nuti; S Gonnelli; M L Brandi; M Muratore; M Rossini
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Anteroposterior versus lateral bone mineral density of spine assessed by dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  L Del Rio; F Pons; M Huguet; F J Setoain; J Setoain
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-05

7.  Lateral spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral measurement with fan-beam design: effect of osteophytic calcifications on lateral and anteroposterior spine BMD.

Authors:  H Franck; M Munz; M Scherrer; H v Lilienfeld-Toal
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.631

8.  Bone mineral density in feline mucopolysaccharidosis VI measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  A S Turner; R W Norrdin; S Gaarde; H E Connally; M A Thrall
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Relative contribution of vertebral body and posterior arch in female and male lumbar spine peak bone mass.

Authors:  P E Fournier; R Rizzoli; D O Slosman; B Buchs; J P Bonjour
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Which vertebrae should be assessed using lateral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  M Jergas; M Breitenseher; C C Glüer; D Black; P Lang; S Grampp; K Engelke; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.