Literature DB >> 2347908

Lateral dual energy radiography: a new method for measuring vertebral bone density: a preliminary study.

R Rupich1, R Pacifici, M Griffin, I Vered, N Susman, L V Avioli.   

Abstract

Dual energy radiography (DER) is a new technique for non-invasive measurement of vertebral bone mineral density, which because of its high precision (1%), is particularly suitable for prospective analyses of time-related changes in bone mass. However, we recently found that DER is less sensitive to demineralization of trabecular bone than quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Since the compact bone of the posterior vertebral elements are included in the standard anterior-posterior DER (APDER), but not in QCT measurements, changes in trabecular bone mass attending the early phases of the osteoporotic process go undetected with the APDER technique due to the preponderance of cortical mass. Lateral-view DER (LDER), however, would minimize the contribution of vertebral compact bone as well as intra-abdominal calcifications to the trabecular component. To determine the in vivo short-term precision of the LDER method, we obtained three measurements in 18 healthy women, aged 23 to 76, during a four-week period. In addition, both APDER and LDER measurements were obtained in 53 healthy women, aged 23 to 80. The coefficient of variation for LDER was 2.8%. LDER density values accounted for a higher percentage of the variance of bone mass measurements with age (47%) than APDER (23%). Moreover, LDER declined significantly with age in both premenopausal (r = -0.42, p less than 0.05) and post-menopausal women (r = -0.50, p less than 0.005), whereas the age-related changes in APDER values failed to reach statistical significance in either group. The rate of bone loss with age in the premenopausal group was 0.45% per year with LDER, and 0.10% per year with APDER. Postmenopausal women showed a 0.78% loss of bone mass per year with LDER and 0.47% per year with APDER. The correlation between APDER and LDER was significant (r = 0.78, p less than 0.01). The accumulated data indicate that LDER may be a more appropriate technique than APDER for detecting the initial loss of vertebral trabecular bone that characterizes early subclinical osteoporotic syndrome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2347908     DOI: 10.1210/jcem-70-6-1768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  13 in total

Review 1.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Bone mineral density before and after surgical cure of Cushing's syndrome due to adrenocortical adenoma: prospective study.

Authors:  Akiko Kawamata; Masatoshi Iihara; Takahiro Okamoto; Takao Obara
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  DEXA measurement of spine density in the lateral projection. I: Methodology.

Authors:  R B Mazess; C A Gifford; J P Bisek; H S Barden; J A Hanson
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 4.  Measurement of bone mineral density.

Authors:  C Hassager; C Christiansen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Age changes of spine density in posterior-anterior and lateral projections in normal women.

Authors:  R B Mazess; H S Barden; R W Eberle; M D Denton
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 6.  Bone densitometry: current assessment.

Authors:  H K Genant; K G Faulkner; C C Glüer; K Engelke
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Early postmenopausal diminution of forearm and spinal bone mineral density: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  K Bjarnason; C Hassager; P Ravn; C Christiansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Anteroposterior versus lateral bone mineral density of spine assessed by dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  L Del Rio; F Pons; M Huguet; F J Setoain; J Setoain
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-05

9.  Anteroposterior and lateral spinal DXA for the assessment of vertebral body strength: comparison with hip and forearm measurement.

Authors:  K Bjarnason; C Hassager; O L Svendsen; H Stang; C Christiansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Reproducibility of lateral spine scans using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  T A Larnach; S J Boyd; R C Smart; S P Butler; P G Rohl; T H Diamond
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.