Literature DB >> 8835296

Lateral spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral measurement with fan-beam design: effect of osteophytic calcifications on lateral and anteroposterior spine BMD.

H Franck1, M Munz, M Scherrer, H v Lilienfeld-Toal.   

Abstract

Recently, fan beam (FB) designs have been made available by several manufacturers (Aloka, Hologic Lunar and Sophar) to measure lumbar spine bone mineral area density (BMD) in both an anteroposterior (AP) and a lateral projection. The present study was performed to evaluate some characteristics of a new dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) system for supine lateral scans in normals and to study possible advantages for patients with osteophytic calcifications (OC). The precision errors of in vitro and in vivo measurements were estimated by an anthropomorphic phantom and in healthy volunteers. To study the effect of osteoarthritic changes on AP and lateral DXA measurements, BMC (bone mineral content) and BMD were measured in age-matched women (n = 150) with and without OC. Precision errors for lateral BMD in vitro over 1 and 6 months were 0.58/0.67% (slow/fast scan modes) and 0.67/0.77% (slow/fast scan modes), respectively. The short- and mid-term reproducibility of BMD values were 2% and 3.5%, respectively, using the compare function (3.5% and 7.5%, respectively, without the compare facility). The analysis of women with and without OC (n = 150) demonstrated higher mean values for AP BMD (0.892 +/- 0.145 g/cm2) in patients with OC (n = 75) than in normals (0.836 +/- 0.135 g/cm2, n = 75, difference 6.3%). For lateral scans, BMD differed to a minor degree (3.1%) in patients with OC (0.629 +/- 0.133 g/cm2) compared with normals (0.610 +/- 0.117 g/cm2). Corresponding results were obtained in fast FB mode. Furthermore, we found significant (P < 0.0001) correlations between BMD in lateral and AP scans in patients without OC (r = 0.63) and in patients with OC (r = 0.57). Although the FB design facilitated fast AP and lateral scans, the higher precision errors of lateral scans could limit its application in longitudinal studies. The use of compare function should be recommended. However, BMD of lateral scans was less influenced by OC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8835296     DOI: 10.1007/bf00301772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  24 in total

1.  DEXA measurement of spine density in the lateral projection. I: Methodology.

Authors:  R B Mazess; C A Gifford; J P Bisek; H S Barden; J A Hanson
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Lateral dual-photon absorptiometry: a new technique to measure the bone mineral density at the lumbar spine.

Authors:  D Uebelhart; F Duboeuf; P J Meunier; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Does a single local absorptiometric bone measurement indicate the overall skeletal status? Implications for osteoporosis and osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  A Gotfredsen; B J Riis; C Christiansen; P Rødbro
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Diagnostic value of estimated volumetric bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in osteoporosis.

Authors:  N F Peel; R Eastell
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral measurement--comparison of a single-beam and fan-beam design: the effect of osteophytic calcification on spine bone mineral density.

Authors:  H Franck; M Munz; M Scherrer
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Osteoporosis: diagnosis with lateral and posteroanterior dual x-ray absorptiometry compared with quantitative CT.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; S K Grimston; K C Fischer; R Pacifici
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Bone mineral density and knee osteoarthritis in elderly men and women. The Framingham Study.

Authors:  M T Hannan; J J Anderson; Y Zhang; D Levy; D T Felson
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1993-12

8.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the spine in anteroposterior and lateral projections.

Authors:  F Duboeuf; R Pommet; P J Meunier; P D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Effect of spinal osteophytosis on bone mineral density measurements in vertebral osteoporosis.

Authors:  T Masud; S Langley; P Wiltshire; D V Doyle; T D Spector
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-17

10.  The relationship between osteoarthritis and osteoporosis in the general population: the Chingford Study.

Authors:  D J Hart; I Mootoosamy; D V Doyle; T D Spector
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 19.103

View more
  2 in total

1.  Bone microarchitecture and metabolism in elderly male patients with signs of intravertebral cleft on MRI.

Authors:  Haoran Qi; Jun Qi; Ye Sun; Junying Gao; Jianmin Sun; Guodong Wang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  [Bone densitometry in inflammatory rheumatic diseases : Characteristics of the measurement site and disease-specific factors].

Authors:  H Franck; J Braun; F Buttgereit; W Demary; G Hein; J Kekow; G Schett; P M Kern
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.372

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.