Literature DB >> 7812074

Relative contribution of vertebral body and posterior arch in female and male lumbar spine peak bone mass.

P E Fournier1, R Rizzoli, D O Slosman, B Buchs, J P Bonjour.   

Abstract

Peak bone mass (PBM) is an important reference value in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. It is usually established by determining the areal bone mineral density (BMD in g/cm2) for a given site of the skeleton in young healthy adults. This measurement takes into account both the thickness and the integrated mineral density of the bone scanned. It should therefore be a major determinant of the resistance to mechanical stress. However, in lumbar spine the mean BMD as determined by dual-energy either isotopic or X-ray (DXA) absorptiometry in antero-posterior (ap) view was repeatedly found not to be different between male and female young healthy adults despite the greater volume of lumbar vertebral bodies in males. A greater contribution of the posterior vertebral arch to areal BMD-ap in females than in males could account for such an apparent discrepancy. In order to clarify this issue we have determined in 65 (32 male and 33 female) young healthy adults aged 20-35 years the relative contribution of the vertebral body (VB) and posterior vertebral arch (VA) to BMD and bone mineral content (BMC) of L2-3 measured by both antero-posterior and lateral (lat) scanning using DXA. In young healthy adults mean BMC in antero-posterior view was found not to be significantly different from the total BMC determined by lateral scanning including both VB and VA. This allowed us then to calculate the VA BMC by substracting VB BMC-lat from BMC-ap.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7812074     DOI: 10.1007/bf01623350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  33 in total

1.  Bone strength: the bottom line.

Authors:  T A Einhorn
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Morphometric analysis of vertebrae and intervertebral discs as a basis of disc replacement.

Authors:  S Aharinejad; R Bertagnoli; K Wicke; W Firbas; B Schneider
Journal:  Am J Anat       Date:  1990-09

3.  DEXA measurement of spine density in the lateral projection. I: Methodology.

Authors:  R B Mazess; C A Gifford; J P Bisek; H S Barden; J A Hanson
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 4.  Clinical indications for bone mass measurements. A report from the Scientific Advisory Board of the National Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Vertebral body and posterior element morphology: the normal spine in middle life.

Authors:  P V Scoles; A E Linton; B Latimer; M E Levy; B F Digiovanni
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Amount and quality of trabecular bone in osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  J S Arnold
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1973-07

7.  Quantitative histological studies on age changes in bone.

Authors:  M S Dunnill; J A Anderson; R Whitehead
Journal:  J Pathol Bacteriol       Date:  1967-10

8.  Sex differences in age-related changes in vertebral body size, density and biomechanical competence in normal individuals.

Authors:  L Mosekilde; L Mosekilde
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Axial and appendicular bone density predict fractures in older women.

Authors:  D M Black; S R Cummings; H K Genant; M C Nevitt; L Palermo; W Browner
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in a sagittal plane: approach to references for the evaluation of kyphosis and lordosis.

Authors:  P Stagnara; J C De Mauroy; G Dran; G P Gonon; G Costanzo; J Dimnet; A Pasquet
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1982 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  7 in total

1.  Mechanical loading during growth is associated with plane-specific differences in vertebral geometry: A cross-sectional analysis comparing artistic gymnasts vs. non-gymnasts.

Authors:  Jodi N Dowthwaite; Paula F Rosenbaum; Tamara A Scerpella
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Bone mineral density & T-scores.

Authors:  R B Mazess
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Vertebral cross-sectional area: an orphan phenotype with potential implications for female spinal health.

Authors:  T A L Wren; S Ponrartana; V Gilsanz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Asynchrony between the rates of standing height gain and bone mass accumulation during puberty.

Authors:  P E Fournier; R Rizzoli; D O Slosman; G Theintz; J P Bonjour
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Insights into bone health in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Authors:  Victor H Morgenroth; Lauren P Hache; Paula R Clemens
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2012-02-01

6.  Sexual Dimorphism in Newborn Vertebrae and Its Potential Implications.

Authors:  Skorn Ponrartana; Patricia C Aggabao; Naga L Dharmavaram; Carissa L Fisher; Philippe Friedlich; Sherin U Devaskar; Vicente Gilsanz
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 7.  Sexual Dimorphism and the Origins of Human Spinal Health.

Authors:  Vicente Gilsanz; Tishya A L Wren; Skorn Ponrartana; Stefano Mora; Clifford J Rosen
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 19.871

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.