Literature DB >> 1420884

Analysis of electric field stimulation of single cardiac muscle cells.

L Tung1, J R Borderies.   

Abstract

Electrical stimulation of cardiac cells by imposed extracellular electric fields results in a transmembrane potential which is highly nonuniform, with one end of the cell depolarized and the other end hyperpolarized along the field direction. To date, the implications of the close proximity of oppositely polarized membranes on excitability have not been explored. In this work we compare the biophysical basis for field stimulation of cells at rest with that for intracellular current injection, using three Luo-Rudy type membrane patches coupled together as a lumped model to represent the cell membrane. Our model shows that cell excitation is a function of the temporal and spatial distribution of ionic currents and transmembrane potential. The extracellular and intracellular forms of stimulation were compared in greater detail for monophasic and symmetric biphasic rectangular pulses, with duration ranging from 0.5 to 10 ms. Strength-duration curves derived for field stimulation show that over a wide range of pulse durations, biphasic waveforms can recruit and activate membrane patches about as effectively as can monophasic waveforms having the same total pulse duration. We find that excitation with biphasic stimulation results from a synergistic, temporal summation of inward currents through the sodium channel in membrane patches at opposite ends of the cell. Furthermore, with both waveform types, a net inward current through the inwardly rectifying potassium channel contributes to initial membrane depolarization. In contrast, models of stimulation by intracellular current injection do not account for the nonuniformity of transmembrane potential and produce substantially different (even contradictory) results for the case of stimulation from rest.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1420884      PMCID: PMC1262161          DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(92)81632-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  40 in total

1.  Strength-duration and probability of success curves for defibrillation with biphasic waveforms.

Authors:  S A Feeser; A S Tang; K M Kavanagh; D L Rollins; W M Smith; P D Wolf; R E Ideker
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Prolongation of repolarization time by electric field stimulation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in open-chest dogs.

Authors:  X H Zhou; S B Knisley; P D Wolf; D L Rollins; W M Smith; R E Ideker
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 17.367

3.  Threshold reduction with biphasic defibrillator waveforms. Role of excitation channel recovery in a computer model of the ventricular action potential.

Authors:  J L Jones; R E Jones
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.438

4.  Influence of electrical axis of stimulation on excitation of cardiac muscle cells.

Authors:  L Tung; N Sliz; M R Mulligan
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Optical recordings in the rabbit heart show that defibrillation strength shocks prolong the duration of depolarization and the refractory period.

Authors:  S M Dillon
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 17.367

6.  A new cable model formulation based on Green's theorem.

Authors:  L J Leon; F A Roberge
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Analysis of excitable cell activation: relative effects of external electrical stimuli.

Authors:  K W Altman; R Plonsey
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Potential distribution in three-dimensional periodic myocardium--Part II: Application to extracellular stimulation.

Authors:  W Krassowska; D W Frazier; T C Pilkington; R E Ideker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Characterization of refractory period extension by transcardiac shock.

Authors:  R J Sweeney; R M Gill; P R Reid
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Virtual cathode effects during stimulation of cardiac muscle. Two-dimensional in vivo experiments.

Authors:  J P Wikswo; T A Wisialowski; W A Altemeier; J R Balser; H A Kopelman; D M Roden
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 17.367

View more
  13 in total

1.  Spatial heterogeneity of transmembrane potential responses of single guinea-pig cardiac cells during electric field stimulation.

Authors:  Vinod Sharma; Leslie Tung
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Paradoxical loss of excitation with high intensity pulses during electric field stimulation of single cardiac cells.

Authors:  Vinod Sharma; Robert C Susil; Leslie Tung
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Ionic currents involved in shock-induced nonlinear changes in transmembrane potential responses of single cardiac cells.

Authors:  Vinod Sharma; Leslie Tung
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.657

4.  Stimulation of single isolated adult ventricular myocytes within a low volume using a planar microelectrode array.

Authors:  Norbert Klauke; Godfrey L Smith; Jon Cooper
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Monophasic and biphasic electrical stimulation induces a precardiac differentiation in progenitor cells isolated from human heart.

Authors:  Stefano Pietronave; Andrea Zamperone; Francesca Oltolina; Donato Colangelo; Antonia Follenzi; Eugenio Novelli; Marco Diena; Andrea Pavesi; Filippo Consolo; Gianfranco Beniamino Fiore; Monica Soncini; Maria Prat
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.272

6.  Biphasic electrical field stimulation aids in tissue engineering of multicell-type cardiac organoids.

Authors:  Loraine L Y Chiu; Rohin K Iyer; John-Paul King; Milica Radisic
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Deexcitation of cardiac cells.

Authors:  A Pumir; G Romey; V Krinsky
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Mechanisms of cardiac cell excitation with premature monophasic and biphasic field stimuli: a model study.

Authors:  M G Fishler; E A Sobie; N V Thakor; L Tung
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Optical multisite monitoring of cell excitation phenomena in isolated cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  H Windisch; H Ahammer; P Schaffer; W Müller; D Platzer
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.657

10.  Electrical stimulation of cardiac myocytes.

Authors:  R Ranjan; N V Thakor
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.