Literature DB >> 15665123

Paradoxical loss of excitation with high intensity pulses during electric field stimulation of single cardiac cells.

Vinod Sharma1, Robert C Susil, Leslie Tung.   

Abstract

Transmembrane potential responses of single cardiac cells stimulated at rest were studied with uniform rectangular field pulses having durations of 0.5-10 ms. Cells were enzymatically isolated from guinea pig ventricles, stained with voltage sensitive dye di-8-ANEPPS, and stimulated along their long axes. Fluorescence signals were recorded with spatial resolution of 17 microm for up to 11 sites along the cell. With 5 and 10 ms pulses, all cells (n = 10) fired an action potential over a broad range of field amplitudes (approximately 3-65 V/cm). With 0.5 and 1 ms pulses, all cells (n = 7) fired an action potential for field amplitudes ranging from the threshold value (approximately 4-8 V/cm) to 50-60 V/cm. However, when the field amplitude was further increased, five of seven cells failed to fire an action potential. We postulated that this paradoxical loss of excitation for higher amplitude field pulses is the result of nonuniform polarization of the cell membrane under conditions of electric field stimulation, and a counterbalancing interplay between sodium current and inwardly rectifying potassium current with increasing field strength. This hypothesis was verified using computer simulations of a field-stimulated guinea pig ventricular cell. In conclusion, we show that for stimulation with short-duration pulses, cells can be excited for fields ranging between a low amplitude excitation threshold and a high amplitude threshold above which the excitation is suppressed. These results can have implications for the mechanistic understanding of defibrillation outcome, especially in the setting of diseased myocardium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15665123      PMCID: PMC1305396          DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.104.047142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  49 in total

1.  Spatial heterogeneity of transmembrane potential responses of single guinea-pig cardiac cells during electric field stimulation.

Authors:  Vinod Sharma; Leslie Tung
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Electroporation and shock-induced transmembrane potential in a cardiac fiber during defibrillation strength shocks.

Authors:  K A DeBruin; W Krassowska
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  A generalized activating function for predicting virtual electrodes in cardiac tissue.

Authors:  E A Sobie; R C Susil; L Tung
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  A model study of extracellular stimulation of cardiac cells.

Authors:  L J Leon; F A Roberge
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 5.  Energy levels for defibrillation: what is of real clinical importance?

Authors:  P C Fotuhi; A E Epstein; R E Ideker
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1999-03-11       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Design and results of the antiarrhythmics vs implantable defibrillators (AVID) registry. The AVID Investigators.

Authors:  J L Anderson; A P Hallstrom; A E Epstein; S L Pinski; Y Rosenberg; M O Nora; D Chilson; D S Cannom; R Moore
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-04-06       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Canadian implantable defibrillator study (CIDS) : a randomized trial of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator against amiodarone.

Authors:  S J Connolly; M Gent; R S Roberts; P Dorian; D Roy; R S Sheldon; L B Mitchell; M S Green; G J Klein; B O'Brien
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-03-21       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Postshock arrhythmias--a possible cause of unsuccessful defibrillation.

Authors:  J L Jones; R E Jones
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Effect of acute global ischemia on the upper limit of vulnerability: a simulation study.

Authors:  Blanca Rodríguez; Brock M Tice; James C Eason; Felipe Aguel; José M Ferrero; Natalia Trayanova
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2004-01-29       Impact factor: 4.733

10.  ON THE INTENSITY-TIME RELATIONS FOR STIMULATION BY ELECTRIC CURRENTS. II.

Authors:  H A Blair
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1932-07-20       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  6 in total

1.  Extracellular recordings of field potentials from single cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Norbert Klauke; Godfrey L Smith; Jon Cooper
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Optical imaging of voltage and calcium in cardiac cells & tissues.

Authors:  Todd J Herron; Peter Lee; José Jalife
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 17.367

3.  Low energy defibrillation in human cardiac tissue: a simulation study.

Authors:  Stuart W Morgan; Gernot Plank; Irina V Biktasheva; Vadim N Biktashev
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Cardiac myocyte excitation by ultrashort high-field pulses.

Authors:  Sufen Wang; Jiexiao Chen; Meng-Tse Chen; P Thomas Vernier; Martin A Gundersen; Miguel Valderrábano
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Electrical Stimulation for Low-Energy Termination of Cardiac Arrhythmias: a Review.

Authors:  Skylar Buchan; Ronit Kar; Mathews John; Allison Post; Mehdi Razavi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 3.727

6.  Damage-free peripheral nerve stimulation by 12-ns pulsed electric field.

Authors:  Maura Casciola; Shu Xiao; Andrei G Pakhomov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.