Literature DB >> 1873877

Optical recordings in the rabbit heart show that defibrillation strength shocks prolong the duration of depolarization and the refractory period.

S M Dillon1.   

Abstract

The present data were obtained using the technique of optical recording with the voltage-sensitive dye WW781. This technique, unlike electrical methods, was able to provide uninterrupted recordings free of artifacts during defibrillation shocks. Optical recordings were made from sites on the ventricular epicardium of perfused rabbit hearts during electrical pacing. Continuous recordings of the electrophysiological responses of an intact heart to defibrillation threshold-strength shocks were made. It was shown that these shocks were able to stimulate normal-appearing action potentials in nonrefractory myocardium. A new and unexpected finding was that defibrillation threshold-strength shocks were also able to evoke a sustained, depolarizing response from myocardium already undergoing an action potential. This prolonged the time that the myocardium remained in the depolarized state. Prolongation of the depolarized state was accompanied by an equal prolongation of the refractory period. There was no indication that this depolarizing shock response was due to damage of the myocardium by the shock, to heterogeneous electrical responses in the optical recording area, or to the methods used in this study. It is hypothesized that these shocks were able to elicit a new action potential in already depolarized myocardium by hyperpolarizing portions of the myocardium's cellular membranes and, in so doing, to reactivate the fast sodium current. This effect, if prevalent in a fibrillating ventricle, could play a role in the defribillation process by effectively resynchronizing electrical activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1873877     DOI: 10.1161/01.res.69.3.842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Res        ISSN: 0009-7330            Impact factor:   17.367


  15 in total

1.  Optical transmembrane potential recordings during intracardiac defibrillation-strength shocks.

Authors:  D M Clark; A E Pollard; R E Ideker; S B Knisley
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Analysis of electric field stimulation of single cardiac muscle cells.

Authors:  L Tung; J R Borderies
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Asymmetry in membrane responses to electric shocks: insights from bidomain simulations.

Authors:  Takashi Ashihara; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Optical mapping in the developing zebrafish heart.

Authors:  M Khaled Sabeh; Hussein Kekhia; Calum A Macrae
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  Optical recording system based on a fiber optic image conduit: assessment of microscopic activation patterns in cardiac tissue.

Authors:  S Rohr; J P Kucera
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Deexcitation of cardiac cells.

Authors:  A Pumir; G Romey; V Krinsky
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 7.  Optical imaging of voltage and calcium in cardiac cells & tissues.

Authors:  Todd J Herron; Peter Lee; José Jalife
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 17.367

8.  Electrical stimulation of cardiac myocytes.

Authors:  R Ranjan; N V Thakor
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Response of a single cell to an external electric field.

Authors:  W Krassowska; J C Neu
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  [Mechanisms of electrical defibrillation].

Authors:  S Reek; R E Ideker
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.