Literature DB >> 2036724

Prolongation of repolarization time by electric field stimulation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in open-chest dogs.

X H Zhou1, S B Knisley, P D Wolf, D L Rollins, W M Smith, R E Ideker.   

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that 1) electrically induced fibrillation and defibrillation involve prolongation of refractoriness by the shock in addition to stimulation and 2) biphasic waveforms are more efficient for defibrillation than are comparable monophasic waveforms. The purpose of this study was to compare prolongation of action potential duration at 50% repolarization by monophasic and biphasic shocks during paced rhythm. A floating glass microelectrode was used to record intracellularly from the anterior right ventricular epicardium in seven open-chest dogs. After 10 S1 beats paced at an interval of 350 msec, 5-msec and 2.5-msec monophasic shocks and biphasic shocks, with each phase of 2.5 msec, were given via mesh electrodes on either side of the microelectrode. The shock strength was adjusted so that the shock field, measured from eight extracellular electrodes encircling the microelectrode, was about 5 V/cm. Monophasic and biphasic S2 shocks were given starting with an S1-S2 interval of 120 msec, which was increased in 5-msec steps until an action potential was produced by the S2 shock. Both monophasic and biphasic 5 V/cm shock fields caused significant prolongation of action potential duration. The prolongation of action potential duration increased as the S1-S2 interval increased. This prolongation occurred at shorter S1-S2 intervals for 5-msec monophasic shocks than for biphasic shocks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2036724     DOI: 10.1161/01.res.68.6.1761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Res        ISSN: 0009-7330            Impact factor:   17.367


  9 in total

1.  Optical transmembrane potential recordings during intracardiac defibrillation-strength shocks.

Authors:  D M Clark; A E Pollard; R E Ideker; S B Knisley
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Analysis of electric field stimulation of single cardiac muscle cells.

Authors:  L Tung; J R Borderies
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  [Influence of amiodarone on defibrillation threshold and perioperative complications in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with transvenous electrodes and biphasic shocks].

Authors:  W Grimm; V Menz; J Hoffmann; U Timmann; R Moosdorf; B Maisch
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-06

4.  Deexcitation of cardiac cells.

Authors:  A Pumir; G Romey; V Krinsky
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Detachable glass microelectrodes for recording action potentials in active moving organs.

Authors:  Mladen Barbic; Angel Moreno; Tim D Harris; Matthew W Kay
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 4.733

6.  Electrical stimulation of cardiac myocytes.

Authors:  R Ranjan; N V Thakor
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  [Mechanisms of electrical defibrillation].

Authors:  S Reek; R E Ideker
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-03

8.  Effects of defibrillation shock energy and timing on 3-D computer model of heart.

Authors:  R A Province; M G Fishler; N V Thakor
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Superiority of biphasic over monophasic defibrillation shocks is attributable to less intracellular calcium transient heterogeneity.

Authors:  Gyo-Seung Hwang; Liang Tang; Boyoung Joung; Norishige Morita; Hideki Hayashi; Hrayr S Karagueuzian; James N Weiss; Shien-Fong Lin; Peng-Sheng Chen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 24.094

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.