Literature DB >> 1400593

Poleward kinetochore fiber movement occurs during both metaphase and anaphase-A in newt lung cell mitosis.

T J Mitchison1, E D Salmon.   

Abstract

Microtubules in the mitotic spindles of newt lung cells were marked using local photoactivation of fluorescence. The movement of marked segments on kinetochore fibers was tracked by digital fluorescence microscopy in metaphase and anaphase and compared to the rate of chromosome movement. In metaphase, kinetochore oscillations toward and away from the poles were coupled to kinetochore fiber shortening and growth. Marked zones on the kinetochore microtubules, meanwhile, moved slowly polewards at a rate of approximately 0.5 micron/min, which identifies a slow polewards movement, or "flux," of kinetochore microtubules accompanied by depolymerization at the pole, as previously found in PtK2 cells (Mitchison, 1989b). Marks were never seen moving away from the pole, indicating that growth of the kinetochore microtubules occurs only at their kinetochore ends. In anaphase, marked zones on kinetochore microtubules also moved polewards, though at a rate slower than overall kinetochore-to-pole movement. Early in anaphase-A, microtubule depolymerization at kinetochores accounted on average for 75% of the rate of chromosome-to-pole movement, and depolymerization at the pole accounted for 25%. When chromosome-to-pole movement slowed in late anaphase, the contribution of depolymerization at the kinetochores lessened, and flux became the dominant component in some cells. Over the whole course of anaphase-A, depolymerization at kinetochores accounted on average for 63% of kinetochore fiber shortening, and flux for 37%. In some anaphase cells up to 45% of shortening resulted from the action of flux. We conclude that kinetochore microtubules change length predominantly through polymerization and depolymerization at the kinetochores during both metaphase and anaphase as the kinetochores move away from and towards the poles. Depolymerization, though not polymerization, also occurs at the pole during metaphase and anaphase, so that flux contributes to polewards chromosome movements throughout mitosis. Poleward force production for chromosome movements is thus likely to be generated by at least two distinct molecular mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1400593      PMCID: PMC2289668          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.119.3.569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   10.539


  58 in total

1.  The kinesin-like ncd protein of Drosophila is a minus end-directed microtubule motor.

Authors:  H B McDonald; R J Stewart; L S Goldstein
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-12-21       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Two different microtubule-based motor activities with opposite polarities in kinetochores.

Authors:  A A Hyman; T J Mitchison
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-05-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Mitosis: towards a molecular understanding of chromosome behavior.

Authors:  C L Rieder
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 8.382

4.  Localization of cytoplasmic dynein to mitotic spindles and kinetochores.

Authors:  E R Steuer; L Wordeman; T A Schroer; M P Sheetz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-05-17       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Stability of microtubule attachment to metaphase kinetochores in PtK1 cells.

Authors:  L Cassimeris; C L Rieder; G Rupp; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  Poleward force at the kinetochore in metaphase depends on the number of kinetochore microtubules.

Authors:  T S Hays; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 10.539

7.  Microtubule dynamics investigated by microinjection of Paramecium axonemal tubulin: lack of nucleation but proximal assembly of microtubules at the kinetochore during prometaphase.

Authors:  G Geuens; A M Hill; N Levilliers; A Adoutte; M DeBrabander
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Chromosome motion during attachment to the vertebrate spindle: initial saltatory-like behavior of chromosomes and quantitative analysis of force production by nascent kinetochore fibers.

Authors:  S P Alexander; C L Rieder
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Pole-to-chromosome movements induced at metaphase: sites of microtubule disassembly.

Authors:  V E Centonze; G G Borisy
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  Microtubule depolymerization promotes particle and chromosome movement in vitro.

Authors:  M Coue; V A Lombillo; J R McIntosh
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  103 in total

1.  Evidence that kinetochore fibre microtubules shorten predominantly at the pole in anaphase flea-beetle spermatocytes.

Authors:  A Forer; P J Wilson
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Rapid treadmilling of brain microtubules free of microtubule-associated proteins in vitro and its suppression by tau.

Authors:  D Panda; H P Miller; L Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Pac-Man does not resolve the enduring problem of anaphase chromosome movement.

Authors:  J D Pickett-Heaps; A Forer
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.356

4.  Microtubule flux mediates poleward motion of acentric chromosome fragments during meiosis in insect spermatocytes.

Authors:  J R LaFountain; R Oldenbourg; R W Cole; C L Rieder
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.138

5.  Microtubule treadmilling in vitro investigated by fluorescence speckle and confocal microscopy.

Authors:  S Grego; V Cantillana; E D Salmon
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Microtubule flux and sliding in mitotic spindles of Drosophila embryos.

Authors:  Ingrid Brust-Mascher; Jonathan M Scholey
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  Chromosome congression is promoted by CENP-Q- and CENP-E-dependent pathways.

Authors:  James Bancroft; Philip Auckland; Catarina P Samora; Andrew D McAinsh
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  A simple, mechanistic model for directional instability during mitotic chromosome movements.

Authors:  Ajit P Joglekar; Alan J Hunt
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  A functional relationship between NuMA and kid is involved in both spindle organization and chromosome alignment in vertebrate cells.

Authors:  Aime A Levesque; Louisa Howard; Michael B Gordon; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 4.138

10.  Yeast kinetochores do not stabilize Stu2p-dependent spindle microtubule dynamics.

Authors:  Chad G Pearson; Paul S Maddox; Ted R Zarzar; E D Salmon; Kerry Bloom
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2003-07-25       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.