Literature DB >> 2298810

Poleward force at the kinetochore in metaphase depends on the number of kinetochore microtubules.

T S Hays1, E D Salmon.   

Abstract

To examine the dependence of poleward force at a kinetochore on the number of kinetochore microtubules (kMTs), we altered the normal balance in the number of microtubules at opposing homologous kinetochores in meiosis I grasshopper spermatocytes at metaphase with a focused laser microbeam. Observations were made with light and electron microscopy. Irradiations that partially damaged one homologous kinetochore caused the bivalent chromosome to shift to a new equilibrium position closer to the pole to which the unirradiated kinetochore was tethered; the greater the dose of irradiation, the farther the chromosome moved. The number of kMTs on the irradiated kinetochore decreased with severity of irradiation, while the number of kMTs on the unirradiated kinetochore remained constant and independent of chromosome-to-pole distance. Assuming a balance of forces on the chromosome at congression equilibrium, our results demonstrate that the net poleward force on a chromosome depends on the number of kMTs and the distance from the pole. In contrast, the velocity of chromosome movement showed little dependence on the number of kMTs. Possible mechanisms which explain the relationship between the poleward force at a kinetochore, the number of kinetochore microtubules, and the lengths of the kinetochore fibers at congression equilibrium include a "traction fiber model" in which poleward force producers are distributed along the length of the kinetochore fibers, or a "kinetochore motor-polar ejection model" in which force producers located at or near the kinetochore pull the chromosomes poleward along the kMTs and against an ejection force that is produced by the polar microtubule array and increases in strength toward the pole.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2298810      PMCID: PMC2116015          DOI: 10.1083/jcb.110.2.391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Biol        ISSN: 0021-9525            Impact factor:   10.539


  40 in total

1.  Irradiation of parts of individual cells. II. Effects of an ultraviolet microbeam focused on parts of chromosomes.

Authors:  R B URETZ; W BLOOM; R E ZIRKLE
Journal:  Science       Date:  1954-08-06       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Sites of microtubule assembly and disassembly in the mitotic spindle.

Authors:  T Mitchison; L Evans; E Schulze; M Kirschner
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1986-05-23       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Bioenergetics and kinetics of microtubule and actin filament assembly-disassembly.

Authors:  T L Hill; M W Kirschner
Journal:  Int Rev Cytol       Date:  1982

4.  Structure of kinetochore fibers: microtubule continuity and inter-microtubule bridges.

Authors:  P L Witt; H Ris; G G Borisy
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 5.  The formation, structure, and composition of the mammalian kinetochore and kinetochore fiber.

Authors:  C L Rieder
Journal:  Int Rev Cytol       Date:  1982

6.  Opposite end assembly and disassembly of microtubules at steady state in vitro.

Authors:  R L Margolis; L Wilson
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Laser microsurgery in cell and developmental biology.

Authors:  M W Berns; J Aist; J Edwards; K Strahs; J Girton; P McNeill; J B Rattner; M Kitzes; M Hammer-Wilson; L H Liaw; A Siemens; M Koonce; S Peterson; S Brenner; J Burt; R Walter; P J Bryant; D van Dyk; J Coulombe; T Cahill; G S Berns
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-07-31       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Identification of kinesin in sea urchin eggs, and evidence for its localization in the mitotic spindle.

Authors:  J M Scholey; M E Porter; P M Grissom; J R McIntosh
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Dec 5-11       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Do anaphase chromosomes chew their way to the pole or are they pulled by actin?

Authors:  A Forer
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  Chromosomes move poleward in anaphase along stationary microtubules that coordinately disassemble from their kinetochore ends.

Authors:  G J Gorbsky; P J Sammak; G G Borisy
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  41 in total

1.  Microtubule flux mediates poleward motion of acentric chromosome fragments during meiosis in insect spermatocytes.

Authors:  J R LaFountain; R Oldenbourg; R W Cole; C L Rieder
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.138

2.  A simple, mechanistic model for directional instability during mitotic chromosome movements.

Authors:  Ajit P Joglekar; Alan J Hunt
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Mechanisms of microtubule-based kinetochore positioning in the yeast metaphase spindle.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Chad G Pearson; Paul S Maddox; Kerry S Bloom; E D Salmon; David J Odde
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Maloriented bivalents have metaphase positions at the spindle equator with more kinetochore microtubules to one pole than to the other.

Authors:  James R LaFountain; Rudolf Oldenbourg
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 5.  Biophysics of mitosis.

Authors:  J Richard McIntosh; Maxim I Molodtsov; Fazly I Ataullakhanov
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.318

6.  Nucleosome depletion alters the chromatin structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae centromeres.

Authors:  M J Saunders; E Yeh; M Grunstein; K Bloom
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 7.  The perpetual movements of anaphase.

Authors:  Helder Maiato; Mariana Lince-Faria
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 8.  Beyond the code: the mechanical properties of DNA as they relate to mitosis.

Authors:  Kerry S Bloom
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Centromeres were derived from telomeres during the evolution of the eukaryotic chromosome.

Authors:  Alfredo Villasante; José P Abad; María Méndez-Lago
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Force and length in the mitotic spindle.

Authors:  Sophie Dumont; Timothy J Mitchison
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.