Literature DB >> 13677610

The effect of reinforcer delays on the form of the forgetting function.

Rebecca J Sargisson1, K Geoffrey White.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained in a matching-to-sample procedure with retention intervals of 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 s mixed within each session. In different conditions, reinforcement was delayed by 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, or 8 s from correct choice responses. Discriminability decreased with increasing retention-interval duration and with increasing reinforcer delay. Exponential forgetting functions were fitted to discriminability measures plotted as a function of retention interval. Initial discriminability (intercept of the fitted functions) decreased with increasing reinforcer delay. Rate of forgetting (slope of the fitted functions) increased with reinforcer delay, suggesting an interaction between the effects of reinforcer delay and retention interval. The data were well described by multiplying an exponential function describing the effects of retention interval by a hyperbolic function describing the effect of reinforcer delay. This description included an interaction term that allowed for a greater effect of reinforcer delay at longer retention intervals.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 13677610      PMCID: PMC1284948          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2003.80-77

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  18 in total

1.  Generalization of delayed matching to sample following training at different delays.

Authors:  R J Sargisson; K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 2.  Hyperbolic value addition and general models of animal choice.

Authors:  J E Mazur
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Temporal generalization and diffusion in forgetting.

Authors:  K Geoffrey White
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2002-04-28       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory.

Authors:  M C Davison; R D Tustin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Stimuli, reinforcers, and behavior: an integration.

Authors:  M Davison; J Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Characteristics of forgetting functions in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Nonhuman short-term memory: A quantitative reanalysis of selected findings.

Authors:  J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The interaction between stimulus and reinforcer control on remembering.

Authors:  D C McCarthy; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Effects of delayed reinforcement in a concurrent situation.

Authors:  S H Chung
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Delayed stimulus control: recall for single and relational stimuli.

Authors:  K G White; J McKenzie
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  7 in total

1.  Signal-detection analyses of conditional discrimination and delayed matching-to-sample performance.

Authors:  Brent Alsop
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Remembering: the role of extraneous reinforcement.

Authors:  Glenn S Brown; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Seasonal variation in pigeon body weight and delayed matching-to-sample performance.

Authors:  Rebecca J Sargisson; Ian G McLean; Glenn S Brown; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A theory of attending, remembering, and reinforcement in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Michael Davison; Amy L Odum; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Remembering as discrimination in delayed matching to sample: discriminability and bias.

Authors:  Rebecca J Sargisson; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Metacognition in animals.

Authors:  Jonathon D Crystal; Allison L Foote
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2009

7.  Effect of signaled reinforcer magnitude on delayed matching-to-sample performance in individuals with intellectual disabilities.

Authors:  Yusuke Hayashi; Sarah E Hall; Dean C Williams
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 1.777

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.