Literature DB >> 17918423

Remembering as discrimination in delayed matching to sample: discriminability and bias.

Rebecca J Sargisson1, K Geoffrey White.   

Abstract

Task difficulty in delayed matching-to-sample tasks (DMTS) is increased by increasing the length of a retention interval. When tasks become more difficult, choice behavior becomes more susceptible to bias produced by unequal reinforcer ratios. Delaying reinforcement from choice behavior also increases both task difficulty and the biasing effect of unequal reinforcer probability. Six pigeons completed nine DMTS conditions with retention intervals of 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 sec, in which reinforcer delays of 0, 2, and 4 sec were combined with ratios of reinforcer probabilities of .5/.5, .2/.8, and .8/.2 for correct red and green responses. Discriminability (log d) decreased with both increasing retention interval duration and increasing reinforcer delay. Sensitivity to reinforcement, the tendency for ratios of choice responses to follow unequal reinforcer probabilities, also increased as a function of both increasing retention interval and increasing reinforcer delay. The result is consistent with the view that remembering in DMTS tasks is a discriminated operant in which increasing task difficulty increases sensitivity to reinforcement.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17918423     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  21 in total

1.  Generalization of delayed matching to sample following training at different delays.

Authors:  R J Sargisson; K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  An investigation of the differential-outcomes effect within sessions.

Authors:  B M Jones; K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory.

Authors:  M C Davison; R D Tustin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Stimuli, reinforcers, and behavior: an integration.

Authors:  M Davison; J Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Characteristics of forgetting functions in delayed matching to sample.

Authors:  K G White
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Nonhuman short-term memory: A quantitative reanalysis of selected findings.

Authors:  J T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The optimal correction for estimating extreme discriminability.

Authors:  Glenn S Brown; K Geoffrey White
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-08

9.  The interaction between stimulus and reinforcer control on remembering.

Authors:  D C McCarthy; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Effects of differential reinforcement expectancies on successive matching-to-sample performance in pigeons.

Authors:  R E DeLong; E A Wasserman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1981-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Metacognition in animals.

Authors:  Jonathon D Crystal; Allison L Foote
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2009
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.