Literature DB >> 12942983

Audio-vocal responses to repetitive pitch-shift stimulation during a sustained vocalization: improvements in methodology for the pitch-shifting technique.

Jay J Bauer1, Charles R Larson.   

Abstract

The pitch-shift reflex is a sophisticated system that produces a "compensatory" response in voice F0 that is opposite in direction to a change in voice pitch feedback (pitch-shift stimulus), thus correcting for the discrepancy between the intended voice F0 and the feedback pitch. In order to more fully exploit the pitch-shift reflex as a tool for studying the influence of sensory feedback mechanisms underlying voice control, the optimal characteristics of the pitch-shift stimulus must be understood. The present study was undertaken to assess the effects of altering the duration of the interstimulus interval (ISI) and the number of trials comprising an average on measures of the pitch-shift reflex. Pitch-shift stimuli were presented to vocalizing subjects with ISI of 5.0, 2.5, 1.0, and 0.5 s to determine if an increase in ISI altered response properties. With each ISI, measures of event-related averages of the first 10, 15, 20, or 30 pitch-shift reflex responses were compared to see if increases in the number of responses comprising an event-related average altered response properties. Measures of response latency, peak time, magnitude, and prevalence were obtained for all ISI and average conditions. While quantitative measures were similar across ISI and averaging conditions, we observed more instances of "non-responses" with averages of ten trials as well as at an ISI of 0.5 s. These findings suggest an ISI of 1.0 s and an average consisting of at least 15 trials produce optimal results. Future studies using these stimulus parameters may produce more reliable data due to the fivefold decrease in subject participation time and a concomitant decrease in fatigue, boredom, and inattention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12942983      PMCID: PMC1698961          DOI: 10.1121/1.1592161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  23 in total

1.  Instructing subjects to make a voluntary response reveals the presence of two components to the audio-vocal reflex.

Authors:  T C Hain; T A Burnett; S Kiran; C R Larson; S Singh; M K Kenney
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of pitch-shift velocity on voice Fo responses.

Authors:  C R Larson; T A Burnett; S Kiran; T C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Comparison of voice F0 responses to pitch-shift onset and offset conditions.

Authors:  C R Larson; T A Burnett; J J Bauer; S Kiran; T C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on fundamental frequency of long stressed and unstressed syllables.

Authors:  U Natke; K T Kalveram
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Effects of delayed auditory feedback (DAF) on the pitch-shift reflex.

Authors:  T C Hain; T A Burnett; C R Larson; S Kiran
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Somatosensory feedback modulates the respiratory motor program of crystallized birdsong.

Authors:  Roderick A Suthers; Franz Goller; J Martin Wild
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A summation technique for the detection of small evoked potentials.

Authors:  G D DAWSON
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1954-02

8.  Song selectivity and sensorimotor signals in vocal learning and production.

Authors:  M M Solis; M S Brainard; N A Hessler; A J Doupe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Neuronal activity in the medulla oblongata during vocalization. A single-unit recording study in the squirrel monkey.

Authors:  L Lüthe; U Häusler; U Jürgens
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2000-12-05       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Effect of duration of pitch-shifted feedback on vocal responses in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  S Kiran; C R Larson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  23 in total

1.  Effect of tonal native language on voice fundamental frequency responses to pitch feedback perturbations during sustained vocalizations.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Emily Q Wang; Zhaocong Chen; Peng Liu; Charles R Larson; Dongfeng Huang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Vocal responses to unanticipated perturbations in voice loudness feedback: an automatic mechanism for stabilizing voice amplitude.

Authors:  Jay J Bauer; Jay Mittal; Charles R Larson; Timothy C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Corollary Discharge Mechanisms During Vocal Production in Marmoset Monkeys.

Authors:  Steven J Eliades; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2019-06-29

4.  Contributions of Auditory and Somatosensory Feedback to Vocal Motor Control.

Authors:  Dante J Smith; Cara Stepp; Frank H Guenther; Elaine Kearney
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Intermittent theta burst stimulation over right somatosensory larynx cortex enhances vocal pitch-regulation in nonsingers.

Authors:  Sebastian Finkel; Ralf Veit; Martin Lotze; Anders Friberg; Peter Vuust; Surjo Soekadar; Niels Birbaumer; Boris Kleber
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Opposing and following vocal responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback: evidence for different mechanisms of voice pitch control.

Authors:  Roozbeh Behroozmand; Oleg Korzyukov; Lindsey Sattler; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Enhanced neural responses to self-triggered voice pitch feedback perturbations.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Roozbeh Behroozmand; Charles R Larson
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Voice Onset Time in Individuals With Hyperfunctional Voice Disorders: Evidence for Disordered Vocal Motor Control.

Authors:  Victoria S McKenna; Jennifer A Hylkema; Monique C Tardif; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Auditory-Motor Perturbations of Voice Fundamental Frequency: Feedback Delay and Amplification.

Authors:  Hasini R Weerathunge; Defne Abur; Nicole M Enos; Katherine M Brown; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Audio-vocal system regulation in children with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Nicole Russo; Charles Larson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.