Literature DB >> 20386347

Enhanced neural responses to self-triggered voice pitch feedback perturbations.

Hanjun Liu1, Roozbeh Behroozmand, Charles R Larson.   

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of self-triggered voice fundamental frequency (F0) feedback perturbation on auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) during vocalization and listening. Auditory ERPs were examined in response to self-triggered and computer-triggered -200 cents pitch-shift stimuli while participants vocalized or listened to the playback of their self-vocalizations. The stimuli were either presented with a delay of 500-1000 ms after the participants pressed a button or delivered by a computer with an interstimulus interval of 500-1000 ms. Results showed that self-triggered stimuli elicited larger ERPs compared with computer-triggered stimuli during both vocalization and listening conditions. These findings suggest that self-triggered perturbation of self-vocalization auditory feedback may enhance auditory responses to voice feedback pitch perturbation during vocalization and listening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20386347      PMCID: PMC3564218          DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283393a44

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  17 in total

1.  Speaking modifies voice-evoked activity in the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  G Curio; G Neuloh; J Numminen; V Jousmäki; R Hari
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation.

Authors:  S J Blakemore; D M Wolpert; C D Frith
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Modulation of the auditory cortex during speech: an MEG study.

Authors:  John F Houde; Srikantan S Nagarajan; Kensuke Sekihara; Michael M Merzenich
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Effects of perturbation magnitude and voice F0 level on the pitch-shift reflex.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Audio-vocal responses to repetitive pitch-shift stimulation during a sustained vocalization: improvements in methodology for the pitch-shifting technique.

Authors:  Jay J Bauer; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The effects of temporal and event uncertainty in determining the waveforms of the auditory event related potential (ERP).

Authors:  G McCarthy; E Donchin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Computational approaches to motor control.

Authors:  D M Wolpert
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Time-dependent neural processing of auditory feedback during voice pitch error detection.

Authors:  Roozbeh Behroozmand; Hanjun Liu; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Suppression of the auditory N1 event-related potential component with unpredictable self-initiated tones: evidence for internal forward models with dynamic stimulation.

Authors:  Pamela Bäss; Thomas Jacobsen; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 2.997

10.  Speech target modulates speaking induced suppression in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Maria I Ventura; Srikantan S Nagarajan; John F Houde
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 3.288

View more
  12 in total

1.  Understanding the neural mechanisms involved in sensory control of voice production.

Authors:  Amy L Parkinson; Sabina G Flagmeier; Jordan L Manes; Charles R Larson; Bill Rogers; Donald A Robin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The neural changes in connectivity of the voice network during voice pitch perturbation.

Authors:  Sabina G Flagmeier; Kimberly L Ray; Amy L Parkinson; Karl Li; Robert Vargas; Larry R Price; Angela R Laird; Charles R Larson; Donald A Robin
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Effects of voice harmonic complexity on ERP responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback.

Authors:  Roozbeh Behroozmand; Oleg Korzyukov; Charles R Larson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  ERP correlates of pitch error detection in complex tone and voice auditory feedback with missing fundamental.

Authors:  Roozbeh Behroozmand; Oleg Korzyukov; Charles R Larson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  The impact of parkinson's disease on the cortical mechanisms that support auditory-motor integration for voice control.

Authors:  Xiyan Huang; Xi Chen; Nan Yan; Jeffery A Jones; Emily Q Wang; Ling Chen; Zhiqiang Guo; Weifeng Li; Peng Liu; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Sensory-motor networks involved in speech production and motor control: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Roozbeh Behroozmand; Rachel Shebek; Daniel R Hansen; Hiroyuki Oya; Donald A Robin; Matthew A Howard; Jeremy D W Greenlee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  ERP correlates of auditory processing during automatic correction of unexpected perturbations in voice auditory feedback.

Authors:  Oleg Korzyukov; Laura Karvelis; Roozbeh Behroozmand; Charles R Larson
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 2.997

8.  Vocal and Neural Responses to Unexpected Changes in Voice Pitch Auditory Feedback During Register Transitions.

Authors:  Sona Patel; Anjli Lodhavia; Saul Frankford; Oleg Korzyukov; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Processing of self-initiated speech-sounds is different in musicians.

Authors:  Cyrill G M Ott; Lutz Jäncke
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Dynamics of vocalization-induced modulation of auditory cortical activity at mid-utterance.

Authors:  Zhaocong Chen; Jeffery A Jones; Peng Liu; Weifeng Li; Dongfeng Huang; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.