Literature DB >> 10641664

Effects of pitch-shift velocity on voice Fo responses.

C R Larson1, T A Burnett, S Kiran, T C Hain.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that voice fundamental frequency (F0) is modified by changes in the pitch of vocal feedback and have demonstrated that the audio-vocal control system has both open- and closed-loop control properties. However, the extent to which this system operates in closed-loop fashion may have been underestimated in previous work. Because the step-type stimuli used were very rapid, and people are physically unable to change their voice F0 as rapidly as the stimuli, feedback responses might have been reduced or suppressed. In the present study, pitch-shift stimuli, consisting of a disparity between voice F0 and feedback pitch of varying ramp onset velocities, were presented to subjects vocalizing a steady /ah/ sound to examine the effect of stimulus onset on voice F0 responses. Results showed that response velocity covaried with stimulus velocity. Response latency and time of the peak response decreased with increases in stimulus velocity, while response magnitude decreased. A simple feedback model reproduced most features of these responses. These results strongly support previous suggestions that the audio-vocal system monitors auditory feedback and, through closed-loop negative feedback, adjusts voice F0 so as to cancel low-level fluctuations in F0.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10641664     DOI: 10.1121/1.428323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  46 in total

1.  Comparison of voice F0 responses to pitch-shift onset and offset conditions.

Authors:  C R Larson; T A Burnett; J J Bauer; S Kiran; T C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Adaptive auditory feedback control of the production of formant trajectories in the Mandarin triphthong /iau/ and its pattern of generalization.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Satrajit S Ghosh; Frank H Guenther; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effect of tonal native language on voice fundamental frequency responses to pitch feedback perturbations during sustained vocalizations.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Emily Q Wang; Zhaocong Chen; Peng Liu; Charles R Larson; Dongfeng Huang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Voice responses to changes in pitch of voice or tone auditory feedback.

Authors:  Mahalakshmi Sivasankar; Jay J Bauer; Tara Babu; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Laryngeal muscle responses to mechanical displacement of the thyroid cartilage in humans.

Authors:  Torrey M J Loucks; Christopher J Poletto; Keith G Saxon; Christy L Ludlow
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2005-06-02

6.  Vocal responses to unanticipated perturbations in voice loudness feedback: an automatic mechanism for stabilizing voice amplitude.

Authors:  Jay J Bauer; Jay Mittal; Charles R Larson; Timothy C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech.

Authors:  Jason A Tourville; Kevin J Reilly; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Audio-vocal responses to repetitive pitch-shift stimulation during a sustained vocalization: improvements in methodology for the pitch-shifting technique.

Authors:  Jay J Bauer; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The role of vowel perceptual cues in compensatory responses to perturbations of speech auditory feedback.

Authors:  Kevin J Reilly; Kathleen E Dougherty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Age-related differences in vocal responses to pitch feedback perturbations: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Nicole M Russo; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.