Literature DB >> 11386566

Effects of delayed auditory feedback (DAF) on the pitch-shift reflex.

T C Hain1, T A Burnett, C R Larson, S Kiran.   

Abstract

Changes in voice pitch auditory feedback to vocalizing subjects elicit compensatory changes in voice fundamental frequency (F0). The neural mechanisms responsible for this behavior involve the auditory and vocal-motor systems, collectively known as the audio-vocal system. Previous work [Burnett et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3153-3161 (1998); Hain et al., Exp. Brain Res. 130, 133-141 (2000); Larson et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 559-564 (2000)] indicated that this system operates using negative feedback to cancel out low-level errors in voice F0 output. By introducing delays in the auditory feedback pathway, we hoped to transiently "open" the feedback loop and learn which components of the response are most closely related to the timing of the auditory feedback signal. Subjects were presented with pitch-shift stimuli that were paired with a delay of 0, 50, 100, 200, 300, or 500 ms. Delayed auditory feedback did not affect voice F0 response latency or magnitude, but it delayed the timing of later parts of the response. As a further test of the audio-vocal control system, a second experiment was conducted in which delays of 100, 200, or 300 ms were combined with stimuli having onset velocities of 1000 or 330 cents/s. Results confirmed earlier reports that the system is sensitive to velocity of stimulus onset. A simple feedback model reproduced most features of both experiments. These results strongly support previous suggestions that the audio-vocal system monitors auditory feedback and, through closed-loop negative feedback incorporating a delay, adjusts voice F0 so as to cancel unintentional small magnitude fluctuations in F0.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11386566     DOI: 10.1121/1.1366319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of voice F0 responses to pitch-shift onset and offset conditions.

Authors:  C R Larson; T A Burnett; J J Bauer; S Kiran; T C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The role of auditory feedback in sustaining vocal vibrato.

Authors:  Ciara Leydon; Jay J Bauer; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Voice responses to changes in pitch of voice or tone auditory feedback.

Authors:  Mahalakshmi Sivasankar; Jay J Bauer; Tara Babu; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Vocal responses to unanticipated perturbations in voice loudness feedback: an automatic mechanism for stabilizing voice amplitude.

Authors:  Jay J Bauer; Jay Mittal; Charles R Larson; Timothy C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Audio-vocal responses to repetitive pitch-shift stimulation during a sustained vocalization: improvements in methodology for the pitch-shifting technique.

Authors:  Jay J Bauer; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Pitch Shifting With the Commercially Available Eventide Eclipse: Intended and Unintended Changes to the Speech Signal.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Heller Murray; Ashling A Lupiani; Katharine R Kolin; Roxanne K Segina; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Temporal control and compensation for perturbed voicing feedback.

Authors:  Takashi Mitsuya; Ewen N MacDonald; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Understanding the mechanisms underlying voluntary responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback.

Authors:  Sona Patel; Cristina Nishimura; Anjli Lodhavia; Oleg Korzyukov; Amy Parkinson; Donald A Robin; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Auditory-Motor Perturbations of Voice Fundamental Frequency: Feedback Delay and Amplification.

Authors:  Hasini R Weerathunge; Defne Abur; Nicole M Enos; Katherine M Brown; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Echolocating bats rely on audiovocal feedback to adapt sonar signal design.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.