Literature DB >> 32755506

Auditory-Motor Perturbations of Voice Fundamental Frequency: Feedback Delay and Amplification.

Hasini R Weerathunge1, Defne Abur2, Nicole M Enos1,3, Katherine M Brown2, Cara E Stepp1,2,4.   

Abstract

Purpose Gradual and sudden perturbations of vocal fundamental frequency (f o), also known as adaptive and reflexive f o perturbations, are techniques to study the influence of auditory feedback on voice f o control mechanisms. Previous vocal f o perturbations have incorporated varied setup-specific feedback delays and amplifications. Here, we investigated the effects of feedback delays (10-100 ms) and amplifications on both adaptive and reflexive f o perturbation paradigms, encapsulating the variability in equipment-specific delays (3-45 ms) and amplifications utilized in previous experiments. Method Responses to adaptive and reflexive f o perturbations were recorded in 24 typical speakers for four delay conditions (10, 40, 70, and 100 ms) or three amplification conditions (-10, +5, and +10 dB relative to microphone) in a counterbalanced order. Repeated-measures analyses of variance were carried out on the magnitude of f o responses to determine the effect of feedback condition. Results There was a statistically significant effect of the level of auditory feedback amplification on the response magnitude during adaptive f o perturbations, driven by the difference between +10- and -10-dB amplification conditions (hold phase difference: M = 38.3 cents, SD = 51.2 cents; after-effect phase: M = 66.1 cents, SD = 84.6 cents). No other statistically significant effects of condition were found for either paradigm. Conclusions Experimental equipment delays below 100 ms in behavioral paradigms do not affect the results of f o perturbation paradigms. As there is no statistically significant difference between the response magnitudes elicited by +5- and +10-dB auditory amplification conditions, this study is a confirmation that an auditory feedback amplification of +5 dB relative to microphone is sufficient to elicit robust compensatory responses for f o perturbation paradigms.

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32755506      PMCID: PMC7890227          DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  66 in total

1.  Instructing subjects to make a voluntary response reveals the presence of two components to the audio-vocal reflex.

Authors:  T C Hain; T A Burnett; S Kiran; C R Larson; S Singh; M K Kenney
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Comparison of voice F0 responses to pitch-shift onset and offset conditions.

Authors:  C R Larson; T A Burnett; J J Bauer; S Kiran; T C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of delayed auditory feedback (DAF) on the pitch-shift reflex.

Authors:  T C Hain; T A Burnett; C R Larson; S Kiran
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory feedback control of voice fundamental frequency in school children.

Authors:  Peng Liu; Zhaocong Chen; Charles R Larson; Dongfeng Huang; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Cochlear synaptopathy in acquired sensorineural hearing loss: Manifestations and mechanisms.

Authors:  M Charles Liberman; Sharon G Kujawa
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Analysis of the Auditory Feedback and Phonation in Normal Voices.

Authors:  Mareike Arbeiter; Simon Petermann; Ulrich Hoppe; Christopher Bohr; Michael Doellinger; Anke Ziethe
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Auditory-motor mapping for pitch control in singers and nonsingers.

Authors:  Jeffery A Jones; Dwayne Keough
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Reflexive and volitional voice fundamental frequency responses to an anticipated feedback pitch error.

Authors:  Theresa A Burnett; Katie E McCurdy; Jessica C Bright
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Abnormal Speech Motor Control in Individuals with 16p11.2 Deletions.

Authors:  Carly Demopoulos; Hardik Kothare; Danielle Mizuiri; Jennifer Henderson-Sabes; Brieana Fregeau; Jennifer Tjernagel; John F Houde; Elliott H Sherr; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  An Investigation of Compensation and Adaptation to Auditory Perturbations in Individuals With Acquired Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Kirrie J Ballard; Mark Halaki; Paul Sowman; Alise Kha; Ayoub Daliri; Donald A Robin; Jason A Tourville; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  4 in total

1.  Auditory and somatosensory feedback mechanisms of laryngeal and articulatory speech motor control.

Authors:  Hasini R Weerathunge; Tiffany Voon; Monique Tardif; Dante Cilento; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  Feedback and Feedforward Auditory-Motor Processes for Voice and Articulation in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Defne Abur; Austeja Subaciute; Ayoub Daliri; Rosemary A Lester-Smith; Ashling A Lupiani; Dante Cilento; Nicole M Enos; Hasini R Weerathunge; Monique C Tardif; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 2.674

3.  Assessing Ecologically Valid Methods of Auditory Feedback Measurement in Individuals With Typical Speech.

Authors:  Nicole E Tomassi; Hasini R Weerathunge; Megan R Cushman; Jason W Bohland; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.674

4.  Impaired auditory discrimination and auditory-motor integration in hyperfunctional voice disorders.

Authors:  Defne Abur; Austeja Subaciute; Mara Kapsner-Smith; Roxanne K Segina; Lauren F Tracy; J Pieter Noordzij; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.