Literature DB >> 23039441

Opposing and following vocal responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback: evidence for different mechanisms of voice pitch control.

Roozbeh Behroozmand1, Oleg Korzyukov, Lindsey Sattler, Charles R Larson.   

Abstract

The present study describes a technique for analysis of vocal responses to auditory feedback pitch perturbations in which individual trials are first sorted according to response direction and then separately averaged in groups of upward or downward responses. In experiment 1, the stimulus direction was predictable (all upward) but magnitude was randomized between +100, +200, or +500 cents (unpredictable). Results showed that pitch-shift stimuli (PSS) of +100 and +200 cents elicited significantly larger opposing (compensatory) responses than +500 cent stimuli, but no such effect was observed for "following" responses. In experiment 2, subjects were tested in three blocks of trials where for the first two, PSS magnitude and direction were predictable (block 1+100 and block 2-100 cents), and in block 3, the magnitude was predictable (±100 cents) but direction was randomized (upward or downward). Results showed there were slightly more opposing than following responses for predictable PSS direction, but randomized directions led to significantly more opposing than following responses. Results suggest that predictability of stimulus direction and magnitude can modulate vocal responses to feedback pitch perturbations. The function and causes of the opposing and following responses are unknown, but there may be two different neural mechanisms involved in their production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23039441      PMCID: PMC3477187          DOI: 10.1121/1.4746984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  22 in total

1.  Instructing subjects to make a voluntary response reveals the presence of two components to the audio-vocal reflex.

Authors:  T C Hain; T A Burnett; S Kiran; C R Larson; S Singh; M K Kenney
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on voice F0 contours in syllables.

Authors:  Thomas M Donath; Ulrich Natke; Karl Th Kalveram
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perceptual calibration of F0 production: evidence from feedback perturbation.

Authors:  J A Jones; K G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Vocal responses to unanticipated perturbations in voice loudness feedback: an automatic mechanism for stabilizing voice amplitude.

Authors:  Jay J Bauer; Jay Mittal; Charles R Larson; Timothy C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of perturbation magnitude and voice F0 level on the pitch-shift reflex.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Computational approaches to motor control.

Authors:  D M Wolpert
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production.

Authors:  J F Houde; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-02-20       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; Z Ghahramani; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Pulmonary and upper airway afferent influences on the motor pattern of vocalization evoked by excitation of the midbrain periaqueductal gray of the cat.

Authors:  P J Davis; S P Zhang; R Bandler
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1993-04-02       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Human laryngeal responses to auditory stimulation.

Authors:  S Sapir; M D McClean; C R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  23 in total

1.  The effects of stimulus complexity on the preattentive processing of self-generated and nonself voices: An ERP study.

Authors:  Tatiana Conde; Óscar F Gonçalves; Ana P Pinheiro
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Opposing and following responses in sensorimotor speech control: Why responses go both ways.

Authors:  Matthias K Franken; Daniel J Acheson; James M McQueen; Peter Hagoort; Frank Eisner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

3.  The relationship between acoustical and perceptual measures of vocal effort.

Authors:  Victoria S McKenna; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Understanding the mechanisms underlying voluntary responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback.

Authors:  Sona Patel; Cristina Nishimura; Anjli Lodhavia; Oleg Korzyukov; Amy Parkinson; Donald A Robin; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Sensory-motor networks involved in speech production and motor control: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Roozbeh Behroozmand; Rachel Shebek; Daniel R Hansen; Hiroyuki Oya; Donald A Robin; Matthew A Howard; Jeremy D W Greenlee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Auditory-Motor Perturbations of Voice Fundamental Frequency: Feedback Delay and Amplification.

Authors:  Hasini R Weerathunge; Defne Abur; Nicole M Enos; Katherine M Brown; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Predicting auditory feedback control of speech production from subregional shape of subcortical structures.

Authors:  Xiaoying Tang; Na Chen; Siyun Zhang; Jeffery A Jones; Baofeng Zhang; Jingyuan Li; Peng Liu; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Neural bases of sensorimotor adaptation in the vocal motor system.

Authors:  Roozbeh Behroozmand; Stacey Sangtian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Vocal and Neural Responses to Unexpected Changes in Voice Pitch Auditory Feedback During Register Transitions.

Authors:  Sona Patel; Anjli Lodhavia; Saul Frankford; Oleg Korzyukov; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Sensorimotor impairment of speech auditory feedback processing in aphasia.

Authors:  Roozbeh Behroozmand; Lorelei Phillip; Karim Johari; Leonardo Bonilha; Chris Rorden; Gregory Hickok; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.