Literature DB >> 12898086

A haptic size-contrast illusion affects size perception but not grasping.

David A Westwood1, Melvyn A Goodale.   

Abstract

Object features (e.g. size, shape and orientation) are relevant for recognition and identification, but also for the control of manual actions. Converging evidence suggests a dissociation between the visual systems that mediate object perception and object-directed action. Here we present evidence suggesting that a similar dissociation might exist in the haptic domain. We demonstrate that a haptic variation of a size-contrast illusion influences the perceived size of a target object, but not the degree to which the hand is opened when that object is the target of a grasping movement. This finding is consistent with the view that object perception is "scene-based" and takes into consideration not only the size of the target object but also the sizes of other nearby objects. In contrast, the control of object-directed action is primarily driven by the absolute size of the target object independent of the relative sizes of other objects in the environment, suggesting a "actor-based" frame of reference. The present findings suggest that dissociations between action and perception are not unique to the visual system, but might instead reflect a general organizational principle of sensory processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12898086     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1599-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  23 in total

1.  Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion?

Authors:  F Pavani; I Boscagli; F Benvenuti; M Rabuffetti; A Farnè
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics.

Authors:  Y Hu; M A Goodale
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: support for a planning/control model of action.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-02

Review 4.  Hierarchical somatosensory processing.

Authors:  Y Iwamura
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception.

Authors:  A M Haffenden; M A Goodale
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  Cortical control of reaching movements.

Authors:  J F Kalaska; S H Scott; P Cisek; L E Sergio
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 7.  Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements.

Authors:  R A Andersen; L H Snyder; D C Bradley; J Xing
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension: a combined lesion and functional MRI activation study.

Authors:  F Binkofski; C Dohle; S Posse; K M Stephan; H Hefter; R J Seitz; H J Freund
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.

Authors:  S Aglioti; J F DeSouza; M A Goodale
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension.

Authors:  M A Goodale; J P Meenan; H H Bülthoff; D A Nicolle; K J Murphy; C I Racicot
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  8 in total

1.  Online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the parietal operculum disrupts haptic memory for grasping.

Authors:  Luigi Cattaneo; Francesca Maule; Davide Tabarelli; Thomas Brochier; Guido Barchiesi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  A lower visual field advantage for endpoint stability but no advantage for online movement precision.

Authors:  Olav Krigolson; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Differential effects of delay upon visually and haptically guided grasping and perceptual judgments.

Authors:  Charles E Pettypiece; Jody C Culham; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Online corrections can produce illusory bias during closed-loop pointing.

Authors:  C Ehresman; D Saucier; M Heath; G Binsted
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Integration of visual and auditory information for hand actions: preliminary evidence for the contribution of natural sounds to grasping.

Authors:  Anna Sedda; Simona Monaco; Gabriella Bottini; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Numerical magnitude affects online execution, and not planning of visuomotor control.

Authors:  Gal Namdar; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-01-20

7.  Information processing correlates of a size-contrast illusion.

Authors:  Jason M Gold
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-19

8.  Grasping movements toward seen and handheld objects.

Authors:  Ivan Camponogara; Robert Volcic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.