Literature DB >> 18427794

Online corrections can produce illusory bias during closed-loop pointing.

C Ehresman1, D Saucier, M Heath, G Binsted.   

Abstract

This experiment examined whether the impact of pictorial illusions during the execution of goal-directed reaching movements is attributable to ocular motor signaling. We analyzed eye and hand movements directed toward both the vertex of the Müller-Lyer (ML) figure in a closed-loop procedure. Participants pointed to the right vertex of a visual stimulus in two conditions: a control condition wherein the figure (in-ML, neutral, out-ML) presented at response planning remained unchanged throughout the movement, and an experimental condition wherein a neutral figure presented at response planning was perturbed to an illusory figure (in-ML, out-ML) at movement onset. Consistent with previous work from our group (Heath et al. in Exp Brain Res 158:378-384, 2004; Heath et al. in J Mot Behav 37:179-185, 2005b), action-bias present in both conditions; thus illusory bias was introduced into during online control. Although primary saccades were influenced by illusory configurations (control conditions; see Binsted and Elliott in Hum Mov Sci 18:103-117, 1999a), illusory bias developed within the secondary "corrective" saccades during experimental trials (i.e., following a veridical primary saccade). These results support the position that a unitary spatial representation underlies both action and perception and this representation is common to both the manual and oculomotor systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18427794     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1367-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

1.  Ocular perturbations and retinal/extraretinal information: the coordination of saccadic and manual movements.

Authors:  G Binsted; D Elliott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The effect of illusory size on force production when grasping objects.

Authors:  D A Westwood; A Dubrowski; H Carnahan; E A Roy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion?

Authors:  F Pavani; I Boscagli; F Benvenuti; M Rabuffetti; A Farnè
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The role of vision in the on-line correction of illusion effects on action.

Authors:  S Glover; P Dixon
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2001-06

5.  Perception-action and the Müller-Lyer illusion: amplitude or endpoint bias?

Authors:  Cheryl M Glazebrook; Victoria P Dhillon; Katherine M Keetch; James Lyons; Eric Amazeen; Daniel J Weeks; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Center of mass attracts attention.

Authors:  Xiaolin Zhou; Hengqing Chu; Xiaoxu Li; Yujie Zhan
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  The effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on the planning and control of manual aiming movements.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Mendoza; Digby Elliott; Daniel V Meegan; James L Lyons; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.

Authors:  S Aglioti; J F DeSouza; M A Goodale
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Diamond-winged variants of the Müller-Lyer figure: a test of Virsu's (1971) centroid theory.

Authors:  P R DeLucia; S P Longmire; J Kennish
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-03

10.  Extraocular muscle proprioception functions in the control of ocular alignment and eye movement conjugacy.

Authors:  R F Lewis; D S Zee; B M Gaymard; B L Guthrie
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  2 in total

1.  Stimulus-driven saccades are characterized by an invariant undershooting bias: no evidence for a range effect.

Authors:  Caitlin Gillen; Jeffrey Weiler; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on saccades is modulated by spatial predictability and saccadic latency.

Authors:  Denise D J de Grave; Nicola Bruno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.