Literature DB >> 19404627

Differential effects of delay upon visually and haptically guided grasping and perceptual judgments.

Charles E Pettypiece1, Jody C Culham, Melvyn A Goodale.   

Abstract

Experiments with visual illusions have revealed a dissociation between the systems that mediate object perception and those responsible for object-directed action. More recently, an experiment on a haptic version of the visual size-contrast illusion has provided evidence for the notion that the haptic modality shows a similar dissociation when grasping and estimating the size of objects in real-time. Here we present evidence suggesting that the similarities between the two modalities begin to break down once a delay is introduced between when people feel the target object and when they perform the grasp or estimation. In particular, when grasping after a delay in a haptic paradigm, people scale their grasps differently when the target is presented with a flanking object of a different size (although the difference does not reflect a size-contrast effect). When estimating after a delay, however, it appears that people ignore the size of the flanking objects entirely. This does not fit well with the results commonly found in visual experiments. Thus, introducing a delay reveals important differences in the way in which haptic and visual memories are stored and accessed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19404627     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1807-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  12 in total

1.  Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics.

Authors:  Y Hu; M A Goodale
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Two distinct modes of control for object-directed action.

Authors:  Melvyn A Goodale; David A Westwood; A David Milner
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.453

3.  Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action.

Authors:  David A Westwood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2003

Review 4.  Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action.

Authors:  H Chris Dijkerman; Edward H F de Haan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 5.  Action without perception in human vision.

Authors:  Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2008 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception.

Authors:  A M Haffenden; M A Goodale
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.

Authors:  S Aglioti; J F DeSouza; M A Goodale
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 8.  Visually guided pointing, the Müller-Lyer illusion, and the functional interpretation of the dorsal-ventral split: conclusions from 33 independent studies.

Authors:  Nicola Bruno; Paolo Bernardis; Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  A double dissociation between somatosensory processing for perception and action.

Authors:  Helen A Anema; Martine J E van Zandvoort; Edward H F de Haan; L Jaap Kappelle; Paul L M de Kort; Ben P W Jansen; H Chris Dijkerman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Visual illusions, delayed grasping, and memory: no shift from dorsal to ventral control.

Authors:  V H Franz; C Hesse; S Kollath
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  7 in total

1.  Hand shaping using hapsis resembles visually guided hand shaping.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Lori-Ann R Sacrey; Jon B Doan; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Oral hapsis guides accurate hand preshaping for grasping food targets in the mouth.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Lori-Ann R Sacrey; Jon B Doan; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Integration of haptic and visual size cues in perception and action revealed through cross-modal conflict.

Authors:  Charles E Pettypiece; Melvyn A Goodale; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Nonvisual learning of intrinsic object properties in a reaching task dissociates grasp from reach.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Leandra R Schneider; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Grasping movements toward seen and handheld objects.

Authors:  Ivan Camponogara; Robert Volcic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Grasping without sight: insights from the congenitally blind.

Authors:  Kayla D Stone; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Pantomime-Grasping: Advance Knowledge of Haptic Feedback Availability Supports an Absolute Visuo-Haptic Calibration.

Authors:  Shirin Davarpanah Jazi; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.