Literature DB >> 12871922

Genotyping error detection through tightly linked markers.

Guohua Zou1, Deyun Pan, Hongyu Zhao.   

Abstract

The identification of genotyping errors is an important issue in mapping complex disease genes. Although it is common practice to genotype multiple markers in a candidate region in genetic studies, the potential benefit of jointly analyzing multiple markers to detect genotyping errors has not been investigated. In this article, we discuss genotyping error detections for a set of tightly linked markers in nuclear families, and the objective is to identify families likely to have genotyping errors at one or more markers. We make use of the fact that recombination is a very unlikely event among these markers. We first show that, with family trios, no extra information can be gained by jointly analyzing markers if no phase information is available, and error detection rates are usually low if Mendelian consistency is used as the only standard for checking errors. However, for nuclear families with more than one child, error detection rates can be greatly increased with the consideration of more markers. Error detection rates also increase with the number of children in each family. Because families displaying Mendelian consistency may still have genotyping errors, we calculate the probability that a family displaying Mendelian consistency has correct genotypes. These probabilities can help identify families that, although showing Mendelian consistency, may have genotyping errors. In addition, we examine the benefit of available haplotype frequencies in the general population on genotyping error detections. We show that both error detection rates and the probability that an observed family displaying Mendelian consistency has correct genotypes can be greatly increased when such additional information is available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12871922      PMCID: PMC1462623     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  19 in total

1.  Assessment and management of single nucleotide polymorphism genotype errors in genetic association analysis.

Authors:  D Gordon; J Ott
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2001

2.  A multipoint method for detecting genotyping errors and mutations in sibling-pair linkage data.

Authors:  J A Douglas; M Boehnke; K Lange
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Linkage analysis in the presence of errors IV: joint pseudomarker analysis of linkage and/or linkage disequilibrium on a mixture of pedigrees and singletons when the mode of inheritance cannot be accurately specified.

Authors:  H H Göring; J D Terwilliger
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03-23       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Linkage analysis in the presence of errors III: marker loci and their map as nuisance parameters.

Authors:  H H Göring; J D Terwilliger
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03-23       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Linkage analysis in the presence of errors I: complex-valued recombination fractions and complex phenotypes.

Authors:  H H Göring; J D Terwilliger
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Probability of detection of genotyping errors and mutations as inheritance inconsistencies in nuclear-family data.

Authors:  Julie A Douglas; Andrew D Skol; Michael Boehnke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  A transmission/disequilibrium test that allows for genotyping errors in the analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphism data.

Authors:  D Gordon; S C Heath; X Liu; J Ott
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  The effect that genotyping errors have on the robustness of common linkage-disequilibrium measures.

Authors:  J M Akey; K Zhang; M Xiong; P Doris; L Jin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-05-16       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  PedCheck: a program for identification of genotype incompatibilities in linkage analysis.

Authors:  J R O'Connell; D E Weeks
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  An analytic solution to single nucleotide polymorphism error-detection rates in nuclear families: implications for study design.

Authors:  D Gordon; S M Leal; S C Heath; J Ott
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2000
View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Factors affecting statistical power in the detection of genetic association.

Authors:  Derek Gordon; Stephen J Finch
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Detection of Mendelian consistent genotyping errors in pedigrees.

Authors:  Charles Y K Cheung; Elizabeth A Thompson; Ellen M Wijsman
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  Testing for non-random mating: evidence for ancestry-related assortative mating in the Framingham heart study.

Authors:  Ronnie Sebro; Thomas J Hoffman; Christoph Lange; John J Rogus; Neil J Risch
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  Genotyping error detection in samples of unrelated individuals without replicate genotyping.

Authors:  Nianjun Liu; Dabao Zhang; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 0.444

5.  Estimating the single nucleotide polymorphism genotype misclassification from routine double measurements in a large epidemiologic sample.

Authors:  Iris M Heid; Claudia Lamina; Helmut Küchenhoff; Guido Fischer; Norman Klopp; Melanie Kolz; Harald Grallert; Caren Vollmert; Stefanie Wagner; Cornelia Huth; Julia Müller; Martina Müller; Steven C Hunt; Annette Peters; Bernhard Paulweber; H-Erich Wichmann; Florian Kronenberg; Thomas Illig
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Clinical applications of Genome Polymorphism Scans.

Authors:  James L Weber
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 4.540

7.  Effect of genotyping error in model-free linkage analysis using microsatellite or single-nucleotide polymorphism marker maps.

Authors:  Cheryl L Thompson; Dan Baechle; Qing Lu; George Mathew; Yeunjoo Song; Sudha K Iyengar; Courtney Gray-McGuire; Katrina A B Goddard
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 2.797

8.  Linkage disequilibrium-based quality control for large-scale genetic studies.

Authors:  Paul Scheet; Matthew Stephens
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 5.917

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.