Literature DB >> 24718985

Detection of Mendelian consistent genotyping errors in pedigrees.

Charles Y K Cheung1, Elizabeth A Thompson, Ellen M Wijsman.   

Abstract

Detection of genotyping errors is a necessary step to minimize false results in genetic analysis. This is especially important when the rate of genotyping errors is high, as has been reported for high-throughput sequence data. To detect genotyping errors in pedigrees, Mendelian inconsistent (MI) error checks exist, as do multi-point methods that flag Mendelian consistent (MC) errors for sparse multi-allelic markers. However, few methods exist for detecting MC genotyping errors, particularly for dense variants on large pedigrees. Here, we introduce an efficient method to detect MC errors even for very dense variants (e.g., SNPs and sequencing data) on pedigrees that may be large. Our method first samples inheritance vectors (IVs) using a moderately sparse but informative set of markers using a Markov chain Monte Carlo-based sampler. Using sampled IVs, we considered two test statistics to detect MC genotyping errors: the percentage of IVs inconsistent with observed genotypes (A1) or the posterior probability of error configurations (A2). Using simulations, we show that this method, even with the simpler A1 statistic, is effective for detecting MC genotyping errors in dense variants, with sensitivity almost as high as the theoretical best sensitivity possible. We also evaluate the effectiveness of this method as a function of parameters, when including the observed pattern for genotype, density of framework markers, error rate, allele frequencies, and number of sampled inheritance vectors. Our approach provides a line of defense against false findings based on the use of dense variants in pedigrees.
© 2014 WILEY PERIODICALS, INC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computer program; data cleaning; exome; genome scan; high-throughput

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24718985      PMCID: PMC4081466          DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  43 in total

1.  Relationship inference from trios of individuals, in the presence of typing error.

Authors:  Solveig K Sieberts; Ellen M Wijsman; Elizabeth A Thompson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-11-28       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Detection and integration of genotyping errors in statistical genetics.

Authors:  Eric Sobel; Jeanette C Papp; Kenneth Lange
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  The effect of genotype and pedigree error on linkage analysis: analysis of three asthma genome scans.

Authors:  S S Cherny; G R Abecasis; W O Cookson; P C Sham; L R Cardon
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  Probability of detection of genotyping errors and mutations as inheritance inconsistencies in nuclear-family data.

Authors:  Julie A Douglas; Andrew D Skol; Michael Boehnke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  A transmission/disequilibrium test that allows for genotyping errors in the analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphism data.

Authors:  D Gordon; S C Heath; X Liu; J Ott
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Merlin--rapid analysis of dense genetic maps using sparse gene flow trees.

Authors:  Gonçalo R Abecasis; Stacey S Cherny; William O Cookson; Lon R Cardon
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-12-03       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  A tale of two genotypes: consistency between two high-throughput genotyping centers.

Authors:  Daniel E Weeks; Yvette P Conley; Robert E Ferrell; Tammy S Mah; Michael B Gorin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  The effect that genotyping errors have on the robustness of common linkage-disequilibrium measures.

Authors:  J M Akey; K Zhang; M Xiong; P Doris; L Jin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-05-16       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Caution on pedigree haplotype inference with software that assumes linkage equilibrium.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid; Shannon K McDonnell; Liang Wang; Julie M Cunningham; Stephen N Thibodeau
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  The impact of genotyping error on haplotype reconstruction and frequency estimation.

Authors:  Katherine M Kirk; Lon R Cardon
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.246

View more
  9 in total

1.  PBAP: a pipeline for file processing and quality control of pedigree data with dense genetic markers.

Authors:  Alejandro Q Nato; Nicola H Chapman; Harkirat K Sohi; Hiep D Nguyen; Zoran Brkanac; Ellen M Wijsman
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Quality control of genotypes using heritability estimates of gene content at the marker.

Authors:  Natalia S Forneris; Andres Legarra; Zulma G Vitezica; Shogo Tsuruta; Ignacio Aguilar; Ignacy Misztal; Rodolfo J C Cantet
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Genetic linkage analysis in the age of whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Jurg Ott; Jing Wang; Suzanne M Leal
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Increasing Generality and Power of Rare-Variant Tests by Utilizing Extended Pedigrees.

Authors:  Jae Hoon Sul; Brian E Cade; Michael H Cho; Dandi Qiao; Edwin K Silverman; Susan Redline; Shamil Sunyaev
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Family-based approaches: design, imputation, analysis, and beyond.

Authors:  Ellen M Wijsman
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.797

6.  Whole-genome characterization in pedigreed non-human primates using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) and imputation.

Authors:  Benjamin N Bimber; Michael J Raboin; John Letaw; Kimberly A Nevonen; Jennifer E Spindel; Susan R McCouch; Rita Cervera-Juanes; Eliot Spindel; Lucia Carbone; Betsy Ferguson; Amanda Vinson
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Application of genome analysis strategies in the clinical testing for pediatric diseases.

Authors:  Yaqiong Jin; Li Zhang; Baitang Ning; Huixiao Hong; Wenming Xiao; Weida Tong; Yiran Tao; Xin Ni; Tieliu Shi; Yongli Guo
Journal:  Pediatr Investig       Date:  2018-07-16

8.  High-quality, genome-wide SNP genotypic data for pedigreed germplasm of the diploid outbreeding species apple, peach, and sweet cherry through a common workflow.

Authors:  Stijn Vanderzande; Nicholas P Howard; Lichun Cai; Cassia Da Silva Linge; Laima Antanaviciute; Marco C A M Bink; Johannes W Kruisselbrink; Nahla Bassil; Ksenija Gasic; Amy Iezzoni; Eric Van de Weg; Cameron Peace
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Impact of genotypic errors with equal and unequal family contribution on accuracy of genomic prediction in aquaculture using simulation.

Authors:  N Khalilisamani; P C Thomson; H W Raadsma; M S Khatkar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.