Literature DB >> 10902214

An analytic solution to single nucleotide polymorphism error-detection rates in nuclear families: implications for study design.

D Gordon1, S M Leal, S C Heath, J Ott.   

Abstract

Recently, there has been increased interest in using Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) as a method for detecting genes for complex traits. SNPs are diallelic markers that have the potential to be inexpensively produced using chip technology. It has been suggested that SNPs will be beneficial in study designs that utilize trio data (father, mother, child). In our previous work, we calculated the probability of detecting Mendelian errors at a SNP locus for a trio randomly selected from a population in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The highest error-detection rate was 30%. Here we investigate the error-detection rate when additional sibs are genotyped. We define an error to be a change from a 1 allele to a 2 allele, or vice versa. Typing one additional sib increases the detection rate on average by 10-13%. Typing two additional sibs increases the detection rate on average by 14-19%. The increase in the detection rate is dependent on the allele frequencies. Equal allele frequencies produce the lowest detection rates, independent of true error rates and number of offspring genotyped. Typing additional siblings not only improves error-detection rates, but can also provide additional linkage information. In order to increase linkage information and error-detection rates, at least two additional siblings should be ascertained when available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10902214      PMCID: PMC6148745          DOI: 10.1142/9789814447331_0064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput        ISSN: 2335-6928


  13 in total

1.  True pedigree errors more frequent than apparent errors for single nucleotide polymorphisms.

Authors:  D Gordon; S C Heath; J Ott
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 0.444

2.  PedCheck: a program for identification of genotype incompatibilities in linkage analysis.

Authors:  J R O'Connell; D E Weeks
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  The TDT and other family-based tests for linkage disequilibrium and association.

Authors:  R S Spielman; W J Ewens
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases.

Authors:  N Risch; K Merikangas
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-09-13       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Large-scale identification, mapping, and genotyping of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the human genome.

Authors:  D G Wang; J B Fan; C J Siao; A Berno; P Young; R Sapolsky; G Ghandour; N Perkins; E Winchester; J Spencer; L Kruglyak; L Stein; L Hsie; T Topaloglou; E Hubbell; E Robinson; M Mittmann; M S Morris; N Shen; D Kilburn; J Rioux; C Nusbaum; S Rozen; T J Hudson; R Lipshutz; M Chee; E S Lander
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Extreme discordant sib pairs for mapping quantitative trait loci in humans.

Authors:  N Risch; H Zhang
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-06-16       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Error detection for genetic data, using likelihood methods.

Authors:  M G Ehm; M Kimmel; R W Cottingham
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Detecting marker inconsistencies in human gene mapping.

Authors:  J Ott
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.444

9.  Haplotype relative risks: an easy reliable way to construct a proper control sample for risk calculations.

Authors:  C T Falk; P Rubinstein
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 1.670

10.  Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM).

Authors:  R S Spielman; R E McGinnis; W J Ewens
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  12 in total

1.  Probability of detection of genotyping errors and mutations as inheritance inconsistencies in nuclear-family data.

Authors:  Julie A Douglas; Andrew D Skol; Michael Boehnke
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Evaluating the results of genomewide linkage scans of complex traits by locus counting.

Authors:  Steven Wiltshire; Lon R Cardon; Mark I McCarthy
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-09-25       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Detection of genotyping errors and pseudo-SNPs via deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

Authors:  Suzanne M Leal
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 4.  Factors affecting statistical power in the detection of genetic association.

Authors:  Derek Gordon; Stephen J Finch
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Integration of SNP genotyping confidence scores in IBD inference.

Authors:  Barak Markus; Ohad S Birk; Dan Geiger
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Using Mendelian inheritance to improve high-throughput SNP discovery.

Authors:  Nancy Chen; Cristopher V Van Hout; Srikanth Gottipati; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Genetic linkage analysis in the age of whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Jurg Ott; Jing Wang; Suzanne M Leal
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Deviations from hardy-weinberg equilibrium in parental and unaffected sibling genotype data.

Authors:  Bingshan Li; Suzanne M Leal
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 0.444

9.  Genotyping error detection through tightly linked markers.

Authors:  Guohua Zou; Deyun Pan; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Size matters: just how big is BIG?: Quantifying realistic sample size requirements for human genome epidemiology.

Authors:  Paul R Burton; Anna L Hansell; Isabel Fortier; Teri A Manolio; Muin J Khoury; Julian Little; Paul Elliott
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 7.196

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.