Literature DB >> 18791193

Estimating the single nucleotide polymorphism genotype misclassification from routine double measurements in a large epidemiologic sample.

Iris M Heid1, Claudia Lamina, Helmut Küchenhoff, Guido Fischer, Norman Klopp, Melanie Kolz, Harald Grallert, Caren Vollmert, Stefanie Wagner, Cornelia Huth, Julia Müller, Martina Müller, Steven C Hunt, Annette Peters, Bernhard Paulweber, H-Erich Wichmann, Florian Kronenberg, Thomas Illig.   

Abstract

Previously, estimation of genotype misclassification of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as encountered in epidemiologic practice and involving thousands of subjects was lacking. The authors collected representative data on approximately 14,000 subjects from 8 studies and 646,558 genotypes assessed in 2005 by means of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Overall discordance among 57,805 double genotypes from routine quality control was 0.36%. Fitting different misclassification models by maximum likelihood assuming identical misclassification for all SNPs, the estimated misclassification probabilities ranged from 0.0000 to 0.0035. When applying the misclassification simulation and extrapolation (MC-SIMEX) method for the first time to genetic data to account for the misclassification in a reanalysis of adiponectin-encoding (APM1) gene SNP associations with plasma adiponectin in 1,770 subjects, the authors found no impact of this small error on association estimates but increased estimates for a more substantial error. This study is the first to provide large-scale epidemiologic data on SNP genotype misclassification. The estimated misclassification in this example was small and negligible for association estimates, which is reassuring and essential for detecting SNP associations. In situations with more substantial error, the presented approach using duplicate genotyping and the MC-SIMEX method is practical and helpful for quantifying the genotyping error and its impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18791193      PMCID: PMC2732956          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwn208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  40 in total

1.  Detection and integration of genotyping errors in statistical genetics.

Authors:  Eric Sobel; Jeanette C Papp; Kenneth Lange
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Undetected genotyping errors cause apparent overtransmission of common alleles in the transmission/disequilibrium test.

Authors:  Adele A Mitchell; David J Cutler; Aravinda Chakravarti
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Systematic detection of errors in genetic linkage data.

Authors:  S E Lincoln; E S Lander
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.736

4.  Effect of genotyping error on type-I error rate of affected sib pair studies with genotyped parents.

Authors:  S R Seaman; P Holmans
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 0.444

5.  Effects of differential genotyping error rate on the type I error probability of case-control studies.

Authors:  Valentina Moskvina; Nick Craddock; Peter Holmans; Michael J Owen; Michael C O'Donovan
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 0.444

6.  A general method for dealing with misclassification in regression: the misclassification SIMEX.

Authors:  Helmut Küchenhoff; Samuel M Mwalili; Emmanuel Lesaffre
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  The impact of missing and erroneous genotypes on tagging SNP selection and power of subsequent association tests.

Authors:  Wenlei Liu; Wei Zhao; Gary A Chase
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 0.444

8.  Does nondifferential misclassification of exposure always bias a true effect toward the null value?

Authors:  M Dosemeci; S Wacholder; J H Lubin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  The ATGL gene is associated with free fatty acids, triglycerides, and type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Veit Schoenborn; Iris M Heid; Caren Vollmert; Arno Lingenhel; Ted D Adams; Paul N Hopkins; Thomas Illig; Robert Zimmermann; Rudolf Zechner; Steven C Hunt; Florian Kronenberg
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 9.461

10.  Air pollution and inflammation (interleukin-6, C-reactive protein, fibrinogen) in myocardial infarction survivors.

Authors:  Regina Rückerl; Sonja Greven; Petter Ljungman; Pasi Aalto; Charalambos Antoniades; Tom Bellander; Niklas Berglind; Christina Chrysohoou; Francesco Forastiere; Bénédicte Jacquemin; Stephanie von Klot; Wolfgang Koenig; Helmut Küchenhoff; Timo Lanki; Juha Pekkanen; Carlo A Perucci; Alexandra Schneider; Jordi Sunyer; Annette Peters
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  4 in total

1.  Incorporating duplicate genotype data into linear trend tests of genetic association: methods and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  Bryce Borchers; Marshall Brown; Brian McLellan; Airat Bekmetjev; Nathan L Tintle
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2009-05-05

2.  Single-variant and multi-variant trend tests for genetic association with next-generation sequencing that are robust to sequencing error.

Authors:  Wonkuk Kim; Douglas Londono; Lisheng Zhou; Jinchuan Xing; Alejandro Q Nato; Anthony Musolf; Tara C Matise; Stephen J Finch; Derek Gordon
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 0.444

3.  geck: trio-based comparative benchmarking of variant calls.

Authors:  Péter Kómár; Deniz Kural
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Impact of genotyping errors on the type I error rate and the power of haplotype-based association methods.

Authors:  Vivien Marquard; Lars Beckmann; Iris M Heid; Claudia Lamina; Jenny Chang-Claude
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 2.797

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.