Literature DB >> 19077433

Genotyping error detection in samples of unrelated individuals without replicate genotyping.

Nianjun Liu1, Dabao Zhang, Hongyu Zhao.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Identifying genotyping errors is an important issue in genetic research, yet it has been relatively less studied in samples consisting of unrelated individuals. In this article, we consider several models of genotyping errors, which were originally proposed for pedigree data, for unrelated population samples with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotype data. The mathematical constraints are investigated for detecting genotyping errors without resampling replicates or genotyping relatives.
METHODS: For the various proposed genotyping error models, we unveil the conditions under which the parameters are identifiable. These results are verified through applications to simulated and real SNP data.
RESULTS: We show that, with constraints, two particular models provide both identifiable error rate and allele frequencies of an SNP for unrelated population data. The simulation study shows that these two models present unbiased estimates for the allele frequencies. One of the models also gives an unbiased estimate for the genotyping error rate.
CONCLUSION: While the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test can be used to detect genotyping errors, a key advantage of these models is the explicit estimates of genotyping error rates and allele frequencies. This work may help researchers to estimate error rates and to use the estimates in their analysis to increase power and decrease bias, without the extra work of genotyping family members or replicates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19077433      PMCID: PMC2782542          DOI: 10.1159/000181153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Hered        ISSN: 0001-5652            Impact factor:   0.444


  55 in total

1.  Undetected genotyping errors cause apparent overtransmission of common alleles in the transmission/disequilibrium test.

Authors:  Adele A Mitchell; David J Cutler; Aravinda Chakravarti
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Haplotype frequency estimation in the presence of genotyping errors.

Authors:  Guohua Zou; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 0.444

3.  Detection of genotyping errors by Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium testing.

Authors:  Louise Hosking; Sheena Lumsden; Karen Lewis; Astrid Yeo; Linda McCarthy; Aruna Bansal; John Riley; Ian Purvis; Chun-Fang Xu
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  How to track and assess genotyping errors in population genetics studies.

Authors:  A Bonin; E Bellemain; P Bronken Eidesen; F Pompanon; C Brochmann; P Taberlet
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Effect of genotyping error on type-I error rate of affected sib pair studies with genotyped parents.

Authors:  S R Seaman; P Holmans
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 0.444

6.  [How about the uncertainty in the haplotypes in the population-based KORA studies?].

Authors:  I M Heid; C Lamina; F Bongardt; G Fischer; N Klopp; C Huth; H Küchenhoff; F Kronenberg; H E Wichmann; T Illig
Journal:  Gesundheitswesen       Date:  2005-08

7.  Effects of differential genotyping error rate on the type I error probability of case-control studies.

Authors:  Valentina Moskvina; Nick Craddock; Peter Holmans; Michael J Owen; Michael C O'Donovan
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 0.444

Review 8.  Factors affecting statistical power in the detection of genetic association.

Authors:  Derek Gordon; Stephen J Finch
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Analysis of case-only studies accounting for genotyping error.

Authors:  K F Cheng
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 1.670

10.  Are molecular haplotypes worth the time and expense? A cost-effective method for applying molecular haplotypes.

Authors:  Mark A Levenstien; Jürg Ott; Derek Gordon
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  4 in total

1.  Reducing bias of allele frequency estimates by modeling SNP genotype data with informative missingness.

Authors:  Wan-Yu Lin; Nianjun Liu
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  Comparison of genotype clustering tools with rare variants.

Authors:  Louis-Philippe Lemieux Perreault; Marc-André Legault; Amina Barhdadi; Sylvie Provost; Valérie Normand; Jean-Claude Tardif; Marie-Pierre Dubé
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Beyond Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms: CYP3A5367 Composite and ABCB1 Haplotype Associations to Tacrolimus Pharmacokinetics in Black and White Renal Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Daniel A Brazeau; Kristopher Attwood; Calvin J Meaney; Gregory E Wilding; Joseph D Consiglio; Shirley S Chang; Aijaz Gundroo; Rocco C Venuto; Louise Cooper; Kathleen M Tornatore
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Impact of genotypic errors with equal and unequal family contribution on accuracy of genomic prediction in aquaculture using simulation.

Authors:  N Khalilisamani; P C Thomson; H W Raadsma; M S Khatkar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.