Literature DB >> 12869581

Sequence divergence within transposable element families in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Emmanuelle Lerat1, Carène Rizzon, Christian Biémont.   

Abstract

The availability of the sequenced Drosophila melanogaster genome provides an opportunity to study sequence variation between copies within transposable element families. In this study,we analyzed the 624 copies of 22 transposable element (TE) families (14 LTR retrotransposons, five non-LTR retrotransposons, and three transposons). LTR and non-LTR retrotransposons possessed far fewer divergent elements than the transposons,suggesting that the difference depends on the transposition mechanism. However,there was not a continuous range of divergence of the copies in each class,which were either very similar to the canonical elements,or very divergent from them. This sequence homogeneity among TE family copies matches the theoretical models of the dynamics of these repeated sequences. The sequenced Drosophila genome thus appears to be composed of a mixture of TEs that are still active and of ancient relics that have degenerated and the distribution of which along the chromosomes results from natural selection. This clearly demonstrates that the TEs are highly active within the genome,suggesting that the genetic variability of the Drosophila genome is still being renewed by the action of TEs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12869581      PMCID: PMC403780          DOI: 10.1101/gr.827603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  52 in total

1.  Is the evolution of transposable elements modular?

Authors:  E Lerat; F Brunet; C Bazin; P Capy
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Models of repression of transposition in P-M hybrid dysgenesis by P cytotype and by zygotically encoded repressor proteins.

Authors:  J F Brookfield
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The evolutionary analysis of the Tnt1 retrotransposon in Nicotiana species reveals the high variability of its regulatory sequences.

Authors:  S Vernhettes; M A Grandbastien; J M Casacuberta
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Massive changes in genomic locations of P elements in an inbred line of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  C Biémont; C Arnault; A Heizmann
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1990-10

5.  Transposable element distribution in Drosophila.

Authors:  C Biémont; A Tsitrone; C Vieira; C Hoogland
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  [A small open reading frame of the Stalker retrotransposon reveals a high similarity to the second small frame of the MDG1 retrotransposon].

Authors:  K S Makarova
Journal:  Genetika       Date:  1997-07

7.  Improved tools for biological sequence comparison.

Authors:  W R Pearson; D J Lipman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Evidence that mutation patterns vary among Drosophila transposable elements.

Authors:  D C Shields; P M Sharp
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1989-06-20       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  hobo transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.

Authors:  I A Boussy; S B Daniels
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 1.588

View more
  41 in total

1.  The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XXXVI. Molecular structural analysis of Osvaldo retrotransposon insertions in colonizing populations unveils drift effects in founder events.

Authors:  María Pilar García Guerreiro; Antonio Fontdevila
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  LTR retrotransposon-gene associations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Eric W Ganko; Casey S Greene; Judson A Lewis; Vikram Bhattacharjee; John F McDonald
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Maintenance in the chicken genome of the retroviral-like cENS gene family specifically expressed in early embryos.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Lerat; Anne-Marie Birot; Jacques Samarut; Anne Mey
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Conserved motifs and dynamic aspects of the terminal inverted repeat organization within Bari-like transposons.

Authors:  Roberta Moschetti; Sarantis Chlamydas; Renè Massimiliano Marsano; Ruggiero Caizzi
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.291

5.  Direct determination of the effects of genotype and extreme temperature on the transposition of roo in long-term mutation accumulation lines of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J Fernando Vázquez; Jesús Albornoz; Ana Domínguez
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 3.291

6.  Distribution, diversity, evolution, and survival of Helitrons in the maize genome.

Authors:  Lixing Yang; Jeffrey L Bennetzen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  hAT transposable elements and their derivatives: an analysis in the 12 Drosophila genomes.

Authors:  Mauro de Freitas Ortiz; Karina Rodrigues Lorenzatto; Bruna Renata Silva Corrêa; Elgion Lucio Silva Loreto
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Vertical inheritance and bursts of transposition have shaped the evolution of the BS non-LTR retrotransposon in Drosophila.

Authors:  Adriana Granzotto; Fabrício R Lopes; Cristina Vieira; Claudia M A Carareto
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.291

9.  Bioinformatic analyses of sense and antisense expression from terminal inverted repeat transposons in Drosophila somatic cells.

Authors:  Andrew W Harrington; Mindy Steiniger
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 2.160

10.  Genomic distribution of retrotransposons 297, 1731, copia, mdg1 and roo in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup.

Authors:  Julia Díaz-González; Ana Domínguez; Jesús Albornoz
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.