Literature DB >> 2547975

Evidence that mutation patterns vary among Drosophila transposable elements.

D C Shields1, P M Sharp.   

Abstract

In Drosophila melanogaster, codon usage in the open reading frames (ORFs) of transposable elements (TEs) differs greatly from that in other ORFs. In addition, while the ORFs from a single element are similar, there is considerable variation among elements. In the TE ORFs there are no indications of selection for the codons prevalent in the other D. melanogaster genes, but rather codon usage can be succinctly summarized in terms of the base composition at silent sites. We suggest that the particular silent site base composition of each TE is determined by an individual pattern of mutation. In many of the TEs there is an ORF encoding a protein with homology to reverse transcriptase; the amino acid sequences of these are quite divergent, and so it is possible that each of these incorporates certain mismatched bases at different frequencies during replication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2547975     DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(89)90252-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  10 in total

1.  R1 and R2 retrotransposable elements of Drosophila evolve at rates similar to those of nuclear genes.

Authors:  D G Eickbush; W C Lathe; M P Francino; T H Eickbush
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Characterization of the FB-NOF transposable element of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  N Harden; M Ashburner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  On the Base Composition of Transposable Elements.

Authors:  Stéphane Boissinot
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  Sequence divergence within transposable element families in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Lerat; Carène Rizzon; Christian Biémont
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Regional base composition variation along yeast chromosome III: evolution of chromosome primary structure.

Authors:  P M Sharp; A T Lloyd
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-01-25       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  The source of laterally transferred genes in bacterial genomes.

Authors:  Vincent Daubin; Emmanuelle Lerat; Guy Perrière
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2003-08-21       Impact factor: 13.583

7.  Codon usage biases of transposable elements and host nuclear genes in Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa.

Authors:  Jia Jia; Qingzhong Xue
Journal:  Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 7.691

8.  Detection of transposable elements by their compositional bias.

Authors:  Olivier Andrieu; Anna-Sophie Fiston; Dominique Anxolabéhère; Hadi Quesneville
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-07-13       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  A genomic survey of transposable elements in the choanoflagellate Salpingoeca rosetta reveals selection on codon usage.

Authors:  Jade Southworth; C Alastair Grace; Alan O Marron; Nazeefa Fatima; Martin Carr
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2019-11-23

10.  Variation in base composition underlies functional and evolutionary divergence in non-LTR retrotransposons.

Authors:  Robert P Ruggiero; Stéphane Boissinot
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2020-04-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.