Literature DB >> 16408244

LTR retrotransposon-gene associations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Eric W Ganko1, Casey S Greene, Judson A Lewis, Vikram Bhattacharjee, John F McDonald.   

Abstract

Thirty-three percent (228/682) of all long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposon sequences (LRSs) present in the sequenced Drosophila melanogaster genome were found to be located in or within 1000 bp of a gene. Recently inserted LTR retrotransposons are significantly more likely to be located in or within genes than are older, fragmented LTR retrotransposon sequences, indicating that most LRS-gene associations are selected against over evolutionary time. LRSs associated with conserved genes (homologenes) are especially prone to negative selection. In contrast, fragmented LRSs that have persisted in the genome over long spans of evolutionary time are preferentially associated with genes involved in signal transduction and other newly evolved functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16408244     DOI: 10.1007/s00239-004-0312-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  50 in total

1.  Evolutionary analyses of the human genome.

Authors:  W H Li; Z Gu; H Wang; A Nekrutenko
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource.

Authors:  M A Harris; J Clark; A Ireland; J Lomax; M Ashburner; R Foulger; K Eilbeck; S Lewis; B Marshall; C Mungall; J Richter; G M Rubin; J A Blake; C Bult; M Dolan; H Drabkin; J T Eppig; D P Hill; L Ni; M Ringwald; R Balakrishnan; J M Cherry; K R Christie; M C Costanzo; S S Dwight; S Engel; D G Fisk; J E Hirschman; E L Hong; R S Nash; A Sethuraman; C L Theesfeld; D Botstein; K Dolinski; B Feierbach; T Berardini; S Mundodi; S Y Rhee; R Apweiler; D Barrell; E Camon; E Dimmer; V Lee; R Chisholm; P Gaudet; W Kibbe; R Kishore; E M Schwarz; P Sternberg; M Gwinn; L Hannick; J Wortman; M Berriman; V Wood; N de la Cruz; P Tonellato; P Jaiswal; T Seigfried; R White
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Nonrandom distribution of alu elements in genes of various functional categories: insight from analysis of human chromosomes 21 and 22.

Authors:  Deepak Grover; Partha P Majumder; Chandrika B Rao; Samir K Brahmachari; Mitali Mukerji
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-06-27       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  The functional genomic distribution of protein divergence in two animal phyla: coevolution, genomic conflict, and constraint.

Authors:  Cristian I Castillo-Davis; Fyodor A Kondrashov; Daniel L Hartl; Rob J Kulathinal
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Genomic scrap yard: how genomes utilize all that junk.

Authors:  W Makałowski
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2000-12-23       Impact factor: 3.688

6.  The significance of responses of the genome to challenge.

Authors:  B McClintock
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-11-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Evolution and consequences of transposable elements.

Authors:  J F McDonald
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.578

8.  A single p450 allele associated with insecticide resistance in Drosophila.

Authors:  P J Daborn; J L Yen; M R Bogwitz; G Le Goff; E Feil; S Jeffers; N Tijet; T Perry; D Heckel; P Batterham; R Feyereisen; T G Wilson; R H ffrench-Constant
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  DNA loss and evolution of genome size in Drosophila.

Authors:  Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  Evidence for the adaptive significance of an LTR retrotransposon sequence in a Drosophila heterochromatic gene.

Authors:  Andrea M McCollum; Eric W Ganko; Paula A Barrass; Jose M Rodriguez; John F McDonald
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  12 in total

1.  Analysis of genes associated with retrotransposons in the rice genome.

Authors:  Nicholas Krom; Jill Recla; Wusirika Ramakrishna
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-12-09       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  The Classic Lobe Eye Phenotype of Drosophila Is Caused by Transposon Insertion-Induced Misexpression of a Zinc-Finger Transcription Factor.

Authors:  Wonseok Son; Kwang-Wook Choi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Proliferation of Ty3/gypsy-like retrotransposons in hybrid sunflower taxa inferred from phylogenetic data.

Authors:  Mark C Ungerer; Suzanne C Strakosh; Kaitlin M Stimpson
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 7.431

4.  Transposable elements in Coffea (Gentianales: Rubiacea) transcripts and their role in the origin of protein diversity in flowering plants.

Authors:  Fabrício Ramon Lopes; Marcelo Falsarella Carazzolle; Gonçalo Amarante Guimarães Pereira; Carlos Augusto Colombo; Claudia Marcia Aparecida Carareto
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 3.291

5.  Evolutionary dynamics of the Ty3/gypsy LTR retrotransposons in the genome of Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Jose Manuel C Tubio; Marta Tojo; Laia Bassaganyas; Georgia Escaramis; Igor V Sharakhov; Maria V Sharakhova; Cristian Tornador; Maria F Unger; Horacio Naveira; Javier Costas; Nora J Besansky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Combinatorial effects of transposable elements on gene expression and phenotypic robustness in Drosophila melanogaster development.

Authors:  Alexa W Clemmons; Steven A Wasserman
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  LTR-mediated retroposition as a mechanism of RNA-based duplication in metazoans.

Authors:  Shengjun Tan; Margarida Cardoso-Moreira; Wenwen Shi; Dan Zhang; Jiawei Huang; Yanan Mao; Hangxing Jia; Yaqiong Zhang; Chunyan Chen; Yi Shao; Liang Leng; Zhonghua Liu; Xun Huang; Manyuan Long; Yong E Zhang
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Contrasting patterns of transposable element insertions in Drosophila heat-shock promoters.

Authors:  Robert A Haney; Martin E Feder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  High rate of recent transposable element-induced adaptation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Josefa González; Kapa Lenkov; Mikhail Lipatov; J Michael Macpherson; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  LTR retrotransposons and the evolution of dosage compensation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Lilya V Matyunina; Nathan J Bowen; John F McDonald
Journal:  BMC Mol Biol       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 2.946

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.