Literature DB >> 10952194

Is the evolution of transposable elements modular?

E Lerat1, F Brunet, C Bazin, P Capy.   

Abstract

The evolution of transposable element structures can be analyzed in populations and species and by comparing the functional domains in the main classes of elements. We begin with a synthesis of what we know about the evolution of the mariner elements in the Drosophilidae family in terms of populations and species. We suggest that internal deletion does not occur at random, but appears to frequently occur between short internal repeats. We compared the functional domains of the DNA and/or amino acid sequences to detect similarities between the main classes of elements. This included the gag, reverse transcriptase, and envelope genes of retrotransposons and retroviruses, and the integrases of retrotransposons and retroviruses, and transposases of class II elements. We find that each domain can have its own evolutionary history. Thus, the evolution of transposable elements can be seen to be modular.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10952194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  9 in total

1.  PIF- and Pong-like transposable elements: distribution, evolution and relationship with Tourist-like miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Zhang; Ning Jiang; Cédric Feschotte; Susan R Wessler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Acquisition of an Archaea-like ribonuclease H domain by plant L1 retrotransposons supports modular evolution.

Authors:  Georgy Smyshlyaev; Franka Voigt; Alexander Blinov; Orsolya Barabas; Olga Novikova
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The struggle for life of the genome's selfish architects.

Authors:  Aurélie Hua-Van; Arnaud Le Rouzic; Thibaud S Boutin; Jonathan Filée; Pierre Capy
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 4.540

4.  Sequence divergence within transposable element families in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Lerat; Carène Rizzon; Christian Biémont
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Network dynamics of eukaryotic LTR retroelements beyond phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  Carlos Llorens; Alfonso Muñoz-Pomer; Lucia Bernad; Hector Botella; Andrés Moya
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 4.540

6.  The evolution and diversity of DNA transposons in the genome of the Lizard Anolis carolinensis.

Authors:  Peter A Novick; Jeremy D Smith; Mark Floumanhaft; David A Ray; Stéphane Boissinot
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.416

7.  The Gypsy Database (GyDB) of mobile genetic elements: release 2.0.

Authors:  Carlos Llorens; Ricardo Futami; Laura Covelli; Laura Domínguez-Escribá; Jose M Viu; Daniel Tamarit; Jose Aguilar-Rodríguez; Miguel Vicente-Ripolles; Gonzalo Fuster; Guillermo P Bernet; Florian Maumus; Alfonso Munoz-Pomer; Jose M Sempere; Amparo Latorre; Andres Moya
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Modular organization and reticulate evolution of the ORF1 of Jockey superfamily transposable elements.

Authors:  Cushla J Metcalfe; Didier Casane
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2014-07-01

9.  DARTS: An Algorithm for Domain-Associated Retrotransposon Search in Genome Assemblies.

Authors:  Mikhail Biryukov; Kirill Ustyantsev
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 4.096

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.