Literature DB >> 17151248

The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XXXVI. Molecular structural analysis of Osvaldo retrotransposon insertions in colonizing populations unveils drift effects in founder events.

María Pilar García Guerreiro1, Antonio Fontdevila.   

Abstract

Previous work on transposable element distribution in colonizing populations of Drosophila buzzatii revealed a high frequency of occupancy in several chromosomal sites. Two explanatory hypotheses were advanced: the founder hypothesis, by which founder genetic drift was responsible, and the unstable hypothesis that assigns this unusual distribution to bursts of transposition toward some chromosomal sites. Here, we study the molecular structure of three euchromatic Osvaldo clones isolated from sites occupied at high (A4 and B9) and low frequency (B4) in colonizing populations, to test these hypotheses. Large insertions, duplications, and indels in the Osvaldo coding region and LTR were detected in the A4 clone and a truncated Osvaldo with many substitutions was found in the B9 clone. These altered sequences indicate that the two copies of this retroelement are precolonization insertions. Interestingly, the LTR of the A4 clone and the reverse transcriptase region of B9 show identical sequences in all colonizing populations indicating, most probably, that they are identical by descent. Moreover, Osvaldo is inserted at the same nucleotide site in all colonizing populations. On the other hand an almost identical LTR sequence, except by 1 base deletion, was found in the B4 clone compared to the canonical active Osvaldo element. These results suggest that Osvaldo copies in highly occupied sites are, most probably, identical by descent and strongly favor the founder hypothesis. On the other hand, low-insertion-frequency sites could represent recent transposition events. This work emphasizes the importance of molecular population studies to disentangle the effects of genetic drift and transposition in colonization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17151248      PMCID: PMC1775019          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.064378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  33 in total

1.  MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software.

Authors:  S Kumar; K Tamura; I B Jakobsen; M Nei
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  On the abundance and distribution of transposable elements in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Carolina Bartolomé; Xulio Maside; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Chromosomal distribution of the transposable elements Osvaldo and blanco in original and colonizer populations of Drosophila buzzatii.

Authors:  M P Guerreiro; A Fontdevila
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  Drosophila euchromatic LTR retrotransposons are much younger than the host species in which they reside.

Authors:  N J Bowen; J F McDonald
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Mobile elements and chromosomal evolution in the virilis group of Drosophila.

Authors:  M B Evgen'ev; H Zelentsova; H Poluectova; G T Lyozin; V Veleikodvorskaja; K I Pyatkov; L A Zhivotovsky; M G Kidwell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Wake up of transposable elements following Drosophila simulans worldwide colonization.

Authors:  C Vieira; D Lepetit; S Dumont; C Biémont
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XXXIV. The distribution of the retrotransposon Osvaldo in original and colonizing populations.

Authors:  M Labrador; M C Seleme; A Fontdevila
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Evolution of genome size in Drosophila. is the invader's genome being invaded by transposable elements?

Authors:  Cristina Vieira; Christiane Nardon; Christophe Arpin; David Lepetit; Christian Biémont
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  DNA loss and evolution of genome size in Drosophila.

Authors:  Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.082

10.  The transposable elements of the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatin: a genomics perspective.

Authors:  Joshua S Kaminker; Casey M Bergman; Brent Kronmiller; Joseph Carlson; Robert Svirskas; Sandeep Patel; Erwin Frise; David A Wheeler; Suzanna E Lewis; Gerald M Rubin; Michael Ashburner; Susan E Celniker
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2002-12-23       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  7 in total

1.  The genomic proliferation of transposable elements in colonizing populations: Schistosoma mansoni in the new world.

Authors:  Bhagya K Wijayawardena; J Andrew DeWoody; Dennis J Minchella
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Evolutionary history of the Azteca-like mariner transposons and their host ants.

Authors:  Teresa Palomeque; Olivia Sanllorente; Xulio Maside; Jesús Vela; Pablo Mora; María I Torres; Georges Periquet; Pedro Lorite
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2015-07-21

3.  Osvaldo and Isis retrotransposons as markers of the Drosophila buzzatii colonisation in Australia.

Authors:  María Pilar García Guerreiro; Antonio Fontdevila
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-04-24       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Molecular characterization of the piggyBac-like element, a candidate marker for phylogenetic research of Chilo suppressalis (Walker) in China.

Authors:  Guang-Hua Luo; Xiao-Huan Li; Zhao-Jun Han; Hui-Fang Guo; Qiong Yang; Min Wu; Zhi-Chun Zhang; Bao-Sheng Liu; Lu Qian; Ji-Chao Fang
Journal:  BMC Mol Biol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.946

5.  Distribution of the transposable elements bilbo and gypsy in original and colonizing populations of Drosophila subobscura.

Authors:  María Pilar García Guerreiro; Blanca E Chávez-Sandoval; Joan Balanyà; Lluís Serra; Antonio Fontdevila
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  High genetic differentiation between the M and S molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae in Africa.

Authors:  Caroline Esnault; Matthieu Boulesteix; Jean Bernard Duchemin; Alphonsine A Koffi; Fabrice Chandre; Roch Dabiré; Vincent Robert; Frédéric Simard; Frédéric Tripet; Martin J Donnelly; Didier Fontenille; Christian Biémont
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A genome-wide survey of genetic instability by transposition in Drosophila hybrids.

Authors:  Doris Vela; Antonio Fontdevila; Cristina Vieira; María Pilar García Guerreiro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.