Literature DB >> 19039253

Health-related direct-to-consumer genetic tests: a public health assessment and analysis of practices related to Internet-based tests for risk of thrombosis.

K A B Goddard1, J Robitaille, N F Dowling, A R Parrado, J Fishman, L A Bradley, C A Moore, M J Khoury.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent years have seen increased concern about direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing (i.e., the sale and use of genetic tests without involving a health care provider). Numerous professional organizations have developed policies in this area. However, little systematic evidence exists to inform public policy about these tests.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic search to identify genetic tests that are sold DTC without involving a health care provider. We evaluated the practices of companies offering DTC genetic tests for risk of thrombosis using criteria from multiple sources and a minimal set of key practices.
RESULTS: We identified 84 instances of currently available health-related DTC genetic tests sold on 27 Web sites; the most common were for pharmacogenomics (12), risk of thrombosis (10), and nutrigenomics (10). For the DTC genetic tests for risk of thrombosis, we found low adherence to recommendations. Online information was frequently incomplete and had low agreement with professional recommendations.
CONCLUSION: Our findings document the rapid growth in the availability of health-related DTC genetic tests and highlight the need to improve the delivery of DTC genetic tests. A major implication of this study is the need for the scientific and medical community to develop consistent recommendations to increase their impact. Copyright 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19039253      PMCID: PMC2790792          DOI: 10.1159/000176794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


  23 in total

Review 1.  Dietary supplements: an advertising guide for industry.

Authors: 
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 11.176

2.  Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: access and marketing.

Authors:  Linda L McCabe; Edward R B McCabe
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 8.822

3.  Direct-to-consumer marketing of genetic tests for cancer: buyer beware.

Authors:  Stacy Gray; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-07-21       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Direct-to-consumer sales of genetic services on the Internet.

Authors:  Sarah E Gollust; Benjamin S Wilfond; Sara Chandros Hull
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 5.  Clinical utility of factor V leiden (R506Q) testing for the diagnosis and management of thromboembolic disorders.

Authors:  Richard D Press; Kenneth A Bauer; Jody L Kujovich; John A Heit
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 6.  Role of the geneticist in testing and counseling for inherited thrombophilia.

Authors:  Laura M Reich; Matthew Bower; Nigel S Key
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Physicians' perceived usefulness of and satisfaction with test reports for cystic fibrosis (DeltaF508) and factor V Leiden.

Authors:  Marie Krousel-Wood; Hans C Andersson; Janet Rice; Kelly E Jackson; Eunice R Rosner; Ira M Lubin
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Reading between the lines: direct-to-consumer advertising of genetic testing in the USA.

Authors:  S C Hull; K Prasad
Journal:  Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2001-11

9.  American College of Medical Genetics consensus statement on factor V Leiden mutation testing.

Authors:  W W Grody; J H Griffin; A K Taylor; B R Korf; J A Heit
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Medical genetic test reporting for cystic fibrosis (deltaF508) and factor V Leiden in North American laboratories.

Authors:  Hans C Andersson; Marie A Krousel-Wood; Kelly E Jackson; Janet Rice; Ira M Lubin
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  15 in total

1.  Preferences for genetic and behavioral health information: the impact of risk factors and disease attributions.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Colleen M McBride; Sharon Hensley Alford; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2010-10

2.  Perception of direct-to-consumer genetic testing and direct-to-consumer advertising of genetic tests among members of a large managed care organization.

Authors:  Alanna Kulchak Rahm; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Nicole Wagner; Anh Quynh Le; Eve Halterman; Nadine Cornish; James W Dearing
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Ethical issues of predictive genetic testing for diabetes.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

4.  The incorporation of predictive genomic testing into genetic counseling programs.

Authors:  Ryan Noss; Rachel Mills; Nancy Callanan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Effect of Alzheimer disease genetic risk disclosure on dietary supplement use.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Vernarelli; J Scott Roberts; Susan Hiraki; Clara A Chen; L Adrienne Cupples; Robert C Green
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Nutrigenomic Information in the openEHR Data Set.

Authors:  Priscila Alves Maranhão; Gustavo Marísio Bacelar-Silva; Duarte Nuno Gonçalves Ferreira; Conceição Calhau; Pedro Vieira-Marques; Ricardo João Cruz-Correia
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 2.342

7.  Personalized genomic educational testing: what do the undergrads think?

Authors:  Nicanor Pier Giorgio Austriaco
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 11.229

8.  The impact of risk information exposure on women's beliefs about direct-to-consumer genetic testing for BRCA mutations.

Authors:  S W Gray; R C Hornik; J S Schwartz; K Armstrong
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.438

9.  Consumers' use of web-based information and their decisions about multiplex genetic susceptibility testing.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kaphingst; Colleen M McBride; Christopher Wade; Sharon Hensley Alford; Lawrence C Brody; Andreas D Baxevanis
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Informational content, literacy demands, and usability of websites offering health-related genetic tests directly to consumers.

Authors:  Christina R Lachance; Lori A H Erby; Beth M Ford; Vincent C Allen; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.