Literature DB >> 12853487

A unique right end-enhancer complex precedes synapsis of Mu ends: the enhancer is sequestered within the transpososome throughout transposition.

Shailja Pathania1, Makkuni Jayaram, Rasika M Harshey.   

Abstract

Assembly of the Mu transpososome is dependent on interactions of transposase subunits with the left (L) and right (R) ends of Mu and an enhancer (E). We have followed the order and dynamics of association of these sites within a series of transpososomes prior to and during formation of a three-site complex (LER), engagement of Mu ends by the transposase active site (type 0 complex), cleavage of the ends (type I complex) and their transfer to target DNA (type II complex). LER appears to be preceded by a two-site complex (ER) where E and R are interwrapped twice, as in the mature transpososome. At each stage thereafter, the overall topology of five DNA supercoils is retained: two between E and R, one between E and L and two between L and R. However, L-R interactions within LER appear to be flexible. Unexpectedly, the enhancer was seen to persist within the transpososome through cleavage and strand transfer of Mu ends to target DNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12853487      PMCID: PMC165624          DOI: 10.1093/emboj/cdg354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  26 in total

1.  Topological selectivity of a hybrid site-specific recombination system with elements from Tn3 res/resolvase and bacteriophage P1 loxP/Cre.

Authors:  E Kilbride; M R Boocock; W M Stark
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-06-25       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Enhancer-independent variants of phage Mu transposase: enhancer-specific stimulation of catalytic activity by a partner transposase.

Authors:  J Y Yang; M Jayaram; R M Harshey
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1995-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Topological selectivity in Xer site-specific recombination.

Authors:  S D Colloms; J Bath; D J Sherratt
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-03-21       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  The Mu transposase tetramer is inactive in unassisted strand transfer: an auto-allosteric effect of Mu A promotes the reaction in the absence of Mu B.

Authors:  Z Wu; G Chaconas
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-03-21       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Three-site synapsis during Mu DNA transposition: a critical intermediate preceding engagement of the active site.

Authors:  M A Watson; G Chaconas
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-05-03       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Assembly of phage Mu transpososomes: cooperative transitions assisted by protein and DNA scaffolds.

Authors:  M Mizuuchi; T A Baker; K Mizuuchi
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1995-11-03       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Site-specific HU binding in the Mu transpososome: conversion of a sequence-independent DNA-binding protein into a chemical nuclease.

Authors:  B D Lavoie; G Chaconas
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 8.  Transcriptional activation: a complex puzzle with few easy pieces.

Authors:  R Tjian; T Maniatis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-04-08       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Kinetic and structural probing of the precleavage synaptic complex (type 0) formed during phage Mu transposition. Action of metal ions and reagents specific to single-stranded DNA.

Authors:  Z Wang; S Y Namgoong; X Zhang; R M Harshey
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1996-04-19       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Step-arrest mutants of phage Mu transposase. Implications in DNA-protein assembly, Mu end cleavage, and strand transfer.

Authors:  K Kim; S Y Namgoong; M Jayaram; R M Harshey
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-01-20       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  12 in total

1.  DNA repair by the cryptic endonuclease activity of Mu transposase.

Authors:  Wonyoung Choi; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  3D reconstruction of the Mu transposase and the Type 1 transpososome: a structural framework for Mu DNA transposition.

Authors:  Joy F Yuan; Daniel R Beniac; George Chaconas; F Peter Ottensmeyer
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Enhancer-independent Mu transposition from two topologically distinct synapses.

Authors:  Zhiqi Yin; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Bias between the left and right inverted repeats during IS911 targeted insertion.

Authors:  P Rousseau; C Loot; C Turlan; S Nolivos; M Chandler
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Controlling DNA degradation from a distance: a new role for the Mu transposition enhancer.

Authors:  Wonyoung Choi; Rudra P Saha; Sooin Jang; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 6.  Transposable Phage Mu.

Authors:  Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2014-10

Review 7.  Application of the bacteriophage Mu-driven system for the integration/amplification of target genes in the chromosomes of engineered Gram-negative bacteria--mini review.

Authors:  Valerii Z Akhverdyan; Evgueni R Gak; Irina L Tokmakova; Nataliya V Stoynova; Yurgis A V Yomantas; Sergey V Mashko
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Immunity of replicating Mu to self-integration: a novel mechanism employing MuB protein.

Authors:  Jun Ge; Zheng Lou; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2010-02-01

9.  Coloring the Mu transpososome.

Authors:  Isabel K Darcy; Jeff Chang; Nathan Druivenga; Colin McKinney; Ram K Medikonduri; Stacy Mills; Junalyn Navarra-Madsen; Arun Ponnusamy; Jesse Sweet; Travis Thompson
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The Mu story: how a maverick phage moved the field forward.

Authors:  Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Mob DNA       Date:  2012-12-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.