Literature DB >> 7590234

Enhancer-independent variants of phage Mu transposase: enhancer-specific stimulation of catalytic activity by a partner transposase.

J Y Yang1, M Jayaram, R M Harshey.   

Abstract

Assembly of the functional tetrameric form of phage Mu transposase (A protein) requires specific interactions between the Mu A monomer and its cognate sequences at the ends of the Mu genome (attL and attR) as well as those internal to it (the enhancer element). We describe here deletion variants of Mu A that show enhancer-independence in the assembly of the strand cleavage complex. These deletions remove the amino-terminal region of Mu A required for its interactions with the enhancer elements. The basal enhancer-independent activity of the variant proteins can be stimulated by a partner variant harboring an intact enhancer-binding domain. By exploiting the identical att-binding, and nonidentical enhancer-binding specificities of Mu A and D108 A (transposase of the Mu related phage D108), we show that the stimulation of activity is enhancer-specific. Taken together, these results suggest that the domain of Mu A that includes the enhancer-interacting region may exert negative as well as positive modulatory effects on the strand cleavage reaction. We discuss the implications of these results in the framework of a recent model for the assembly of shared active sites within the Mu A tetramer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7590234     DOI: 10.1101/gad.9.20.2545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Dev        ISSN: 0890-9369            Impact factor:   11.361


  9 in total

1.  A unique right end-enhancer complex precedes synapsis of Mu ends: the enhancer is sequestered within the transpososome throughout transposition.

Authors:  Shailja Pathania; Makkuni Jayaram; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Enhancer-independent Mu transposition from two topologically distinct synapses.

Authors:  Zhiqi Yin; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Communication between Hin recombinase and Fis regulatory subunits during coordinate activation of Hin-catalyzed site-specific DNA inversion.

Authors:  S K Merickel; M J Haykinson; R C Johnson
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Altering the DNA-binding specificity of Mu transposase in vitro.

Authors:  S Y Namgoong; S Sankaralingam; R M Harshey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  A new set of Mu DNA transposition intermediates: alternate pathways of target capture preceding strand transfer.

Authors:  D Z Naigamwalla; G Chaconas
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Controlling DNA degradation from a distance: a new role for the Mu transposition enhancer.

Authors:  Wonyoung Choi; Rudra P Saha; Sooin Jang; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 7.  Transposable Phage Mu.

Authors:  Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2014-10

8.  Deciphering the Roles of Multicomponent Recognition Signals by the AAA+ Unfoldase ClpX.

Authors:  Lorraine Ling; Sherwin P Montaño; Robert T Sauer; Phoebe A Rice; Tania A Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Target DNA bending by the Mu transpososome promotes careful transposition and prevents its reversal.

Authors:  James R Fuller; Phoebe A Rice
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 8.140

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.