Literature DB >> 8621637

Kinetic and structural probing of the precleavage synaptic complex (type 0) formed during phage Mu transposition. Action of metal ions and reagents specific to single-stranded DNA.

Z Wang1, S Y Namgoong, X Zhang, R M Harshey.   

Abstract

In an earlier kinetic study (Wang, Z., and Harshey, R. M. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91, 699-703), we showed that supercoiling free energy was utilized during Mu transposition to lower the activation barrier of some rate-limiting step in the formation of the cleaved Mu end synaptic complex (type I complex). We report here results from kinetic studies on the assembled but uncleaved synaptic complex (type 0). Based on the estimated rate constants for the formation of type 0 and type I complexes, as well as their temperature and superhelicity dependence, we infer that the type 0 complex is an authentic intermediate in the pathway to Mu end cleavage. Our results are consistent with type 0 production being the rate-limiting step in the overall type I reaction. The conversion of type 0 to type I complex is a fast reaction, does not show strong temperature dependence, and is apparently independent of substrate superhelicity. We have explored the DNA structure within the type 0 complex using chemical and enzymatic probes. The observed susceptibility of DNA outside the Mu ends to single-strand-specific reagents suggests that a helix opening event is associated with type 0 formation. This structural perturbation could account, at least partly, for the high activation barrier to the reaction. There is a close correlation between the appearance of single strandedness near the Mu ends and the superhelicity of the DNA substrate. It is possible that supercoiling energy is utilized in effecting specific conformational transitions within DNA. We have found that Zn2+ and Co2+ ions, like Mg2+ and Mn2+ ions, can efficiently cleave the type 0 complex. However, unlike Mg2+ and Mn2+ ions, Zn2+ and Co2+ ions cannot support assembly of type 0. We discuss the implications of our findings for the mechanism of Mu transposition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8621637     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.271.16.9619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  13 in total

1.  Tipping the balance between replicative and simple transposition.

Authors:  N P Tavakoli; K M Derbyshire
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Determinants for hairpin formation in Tn10 transposition.

Authors:  J S Allingham; S J Wardle; D B Haniford
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  A unique right end-enhancer complex precedes synapsis of Mu ends: the enhancer is sequestered within the transpososome throughout transposition.

Authors:  Shailja Pathania; Makkuni Jayaram; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Patterns of sequence conservation at termini of long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons and DNA transposons in the human genome: lessons from phage Mu.

Authors:  Insuk Lee; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  True reversal of Mu integration.

Authors:  T K Au; Shailja Pathania; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  DNA repair by the cryptic endonuclease activity of Mu transposase.

Authors:  Wonyoung Choi; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  3D reconstruction of the Mu transposase and the Type 1 transpososome: a structural framework for Mu DNA transposition.

Authors:  Joy F Yuan; Daniel R Beniac; George Chaconas; F Peter Ottensmeyer
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  The same two monomers within a MuA tetramer provide the DDE domains for the strand cleavage and strand transfer steps of transposition.

Authors:  S Y Namgoong; R M Harshey
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-07-01       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  A new set of Mu DNA transposition intermediates: alternate pathways of target capture preceding strand transfer.

Authors:  D Z Naigamwalla; G Chaconas
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Mu transpososome and RecBCD nuclease collaborate in the repair of simple Mu insertions.

Authors:  Wonyoung Choi; Sooin Jang; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.