Literature DB >> 12835981

Clinical and diagnostic value of preoperative MR mammography and FDG-PET in suspicious breast lesions.

C Walter1, K Scheidhauer, A Scharl, U-J Goering, P Theissen, H Kugel, T Krahe, U Pietrzyk.   

Abstract

Dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) mammography and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) of the breast were directly compared preoperatively in suspicious breast lesions. Forty-two breast lesions in 40 patients were examined with a three-dimensional dynamic MR imaging series and FDG-PET. The MR and PET examinations were evaluated separately and the results were compared with the histological findings. The sensitivity and specificity of each method were calculated. The diagnostic value of both modalities as single diagnostic tool and in combination was investigated. Nineteen malignant and 23 benign breast lesions were proven histologically. Magnetic resonance mammography and FDG-PET showed a sensitivity of 89 and 63%, respectively. The specificity was 74 and 91%, respectively. The combination of both imaging methods decreased the not-required biopsies from 55 to 17%. Only one false-negative finding-a patient pre-treated with chemotherapy-was observed in both methods. The combination of MR mammography and FDG-PET can help to decrease biopsies of benign breast lesions. Because of their high cost, these modalities should only be used in problematic cases to either rule out or to demonstrate malignancy. The best diagnostic strategy is achieved using MR mammography first. If the diagnosis is still questionable, FDG-PET can be performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12835981     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-002-1816-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  28 in total

1.  The role of STIR MRI sequence in the evaluation of the breast following conservative surgery and radiotherapy.

Authors:  G Forrai; C Polgar; K Zana; E Riedl; J Fodor; G Nemeth; B Fornet
Journal:  Neoplasma       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.575

Review 2.  Imaging and management of nonpalpable lesions of the breast.

Authors:  A A Tardivon; J M Guinebretière; C Dromain; D Vanel
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

Authors:  C K Kuhl; P Mielcareck; S Klaschik; C Leutner; E Wardelmann; J Gieseke; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Differentiating benign from malignant enhancing lesions identified at MR imaging of the breast: are time-signal intensity curves an accurate predictor?

Authors:  S G Orel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Breast imaging with fluorine-18-FDG PET: quantitative image analysis.

Authors:  N Avril; S Bense; S I Ziegler; J Dose; W Weber; C Laubenbacher; W Römer; F Jänicke; M Schwaiger
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  An interactive technique for three-dimensional image registration: validation for PET, SPECT, MRI and CT brain studies.

Authors:  U Pietrzyk; K Herholz; G Fink; A Jacobs; R Mielke; I Slansky; M Würker; W D Heiss
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Periodic mammographic follow-up of probably benign lesions: results in 3,184 consecutive cases.

Authors:  E A Sickles
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Role of breast magnetic resonance imaging in determining breast as a source of unknown metastatic lymphadenopathy.

Authors:  R S Henry-Tillman; S E Harms; K C Westbrook; S Korourian; V S Klimberg
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Comparison of pharmacokinetic MRI and [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose PET in the diagnosis of breast cancer: initial experience.

Authors:  G Brix; M Henze; M V Knopp; R Lucht; J Doll; H Junkermann; H Hawighorst; U Haberkorn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast.

Authors:  F Baum; U Fischer; R Vosshenrich; E Grabbe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-02-02       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  11 in total

1.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and sonography in patients receiving primary chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Filippo Montemurro; Laura Martincich; Giovanni De Rosa; Stefano Cirillo; Vincenzo Marra; Nicoletta Biglia; Marco Gatti; Piero Sismondi; Massimo Aglietta; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Breast Cancer Treatment in the Era of Molecular Imaging.

Authors:  Gundula Edelhauser; Martin Funovics
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 3.  Quantitative multimodality imaging in cancer research and therapy.

Authors:  Thomas E Yankeelov; Richard G Abramson; C Chad Quarles
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  The influence of preoperative MRI of the breasts on recurrence rate in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Uwe Fischer; Olivier Zachariae; Friedemann Baum; Dorit von Heyden; Matthias Funke; Torsten Liersch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  A systematic review of FDG-PET in breast cancer.

Authors:  S Escalona; J A Blasco; M M Reza; E Andradas; N Gómez
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 6.  FDG PET and other imaging modalities in the primary diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions.

Authors:  K Scheidhauer; C Walter; M D Seemann
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  The choice of the correct imaging modality in breast cancer management.

Authors:  Emilio Bombardieri; Luca Gianni
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Enhancing area surrounding breast carcinoma on MR mammography: comparison with pathological examination.

Authors:  M Van Goethem; K Schelfout; E Kersschot; C Colpaert; I Verslegers; I Biltjes; W A Tjalma; J Weyler; A De Schepper
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Oncoplastic surgical techniques for personalized breast conserving surgery in breast cancer patient with small to moderate sized breast.

Authors:  Jung Dug Yang; Jeong Woo Lee; Wan Wook Kim; Jin Hyang Jung; Ho Yong Park
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 3.588

10.  Application of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in occult breast cancer: Five case reports.

Authors:  Haisong Yang; Ling Li; Mengmeng Zhang; Shiyong Zhang; Shu Xu; Xiaoxia Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.