Literature DB >> 15248080

The influence of preoperative MRI of the breasts on recurrence rate in patients with breast cancer.

Uwe Fischer1, Olivier Zachariae, Friedemann Baum, Dorit von Heyden, Matthias Funke, Torsten Liersch.   

Abstract

Preoperative MRI of the breasts has been proven to be the most sensitive imaging modality in the detection of multifocal or multicentric tumor manifestations as well as simultaneous contralateral breast cancer. The aim of the presented retrospective study was to evaluate the benefit of preoperative MRI for patients with breast cancer. Preoperative MRI performed in 121 patients (group A) were compared to 225 patients without preoperative MRI (group B). Patients of group A underwent contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast using a 2D FLASH sequence technique (TR/TE/FA 336 ms/5 ms/90 degrees; 32 slices of 4-mm thickness, time of acquisition 1:27 min, contrast agent dosage 0.1 mmol Gd-DTPA/kg bw). All patients had histologically verified breast cancer and follow-up for more than 20 months (mean time group A: 40.3 months, group B: 41 months). Both groups received the same types of systemic treatment after breast conserving surgery. The in-breast tumor recurrence rate in group A was 1/86 (1.2%) compared to 9/133 (6.8%) in group B. Contralateral carcinoma were detected within follow-up in 2/121 (1.7%) in group A vs. 9/225 (4%) in group B. All results were statistically significant (P<0.001). Based on these results, preoperative MRI of the breasts is recommended in patients with histopathologically verified breast cancer for local staging. Copyright 2004 Springer-Verlag

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15248080     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2351-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  31 in total

1.  Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging.

Authors:  L Esserman; N Hylton; L Yassa; J Barclay; S Frankel; E Sickles
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Stopping metastases at their source.

Authors:  S Hellman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-10-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-05-16       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  The use of pathologic features in selecting the extent of surgical resection necessary for breast cancer patients treated by primary radiation therapy.

Authors:  J R Harris; J L Connolly; S J Schnitt; B Cady; S Love; R T Osteen; W B Patterson; R Shirley; S Hellman; R B Cohen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast.

Authors:  F Baum; U Fischer; R Vosshenrich; E Grabbe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-02-02       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Clinical and diagnostic value of preoperative MR mammography and FDG-PET in suspicious breast lesions.

Authors:  C Walter; K Scheidhauer; A Scharl; U-J Goering; P Theissen; H Kugel; T Krahe; U Pietrzyk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-01-23       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Long-term results of breast conservation therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  P T Neff; H D Bear; C V Pierce; M M Grimes; M D Fleming; J P Neifeld; D Arthur; J S Horsley; W Lawrence; M J Kornstein
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (protocol 6). II. Relation of local breast recurrence to multicentricity.

Authors:  E R Fisher; R Sass; B Fisher; R Gregorio; R Brown; L Wickerham
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy.

Authors:  S G Orel; M D Schnall; C M Powell; M G Hochman; L J Solin; B L Fowble; M H Torosian; E F Rosato
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent.

Authors:  C Boetes; R D Mus; R Holland; J O Barentsz; S P Strijk; T Wobbes; J H Hendriks; S H Ruys
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  31 in total

1.  Vacuum-assisted biopsies under MR guidance: results of 72 procedures.

Authors:  C Malhaire; C El Khoury; F Thibault; A Athanasiou; P Petrow; L Ollivier; A Tardivon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Contrast-enhanced MRI in breast cancer patients eligible for breast-conserving therapy: complementary value for subgroups of patients.

Authors:  Eline E Deurloo; William F A Klein Zeggelink; H Jelle Teertstra; Johannes L Peterse; Emiel J Th Rutgers; Sara H Muller; Harry Bartelink; Kenneth G A Gilhuijs
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Should screening MRI be included in surveillance for patients treated with breast-conserving therapy?

Authors:  Murray Rebner; Inga Grills; Frank Vicini
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Oncol       Date:  2008-11-25

4.  Indications for breast magnetic resonance imaging. Consensus document "Attualità in senologia", Florence 2007.

Authors:  F Sardanelli; G M Giuseppetti; G Canavese; L Cataliotti; S Corcione; E Cossu; M Federico; L Marotti; L Martincich; P Panizza; F Podo; M Rosselli Del Turco; C Zuiani; C Alfano; M Bazzocchi; P Belli; S Bianchi; A Cilotti; M Calabrese; L Carbonaro; L Cortesi; C Di Maggio; A Del Maschio; A Esseridou; A Fausto; M Gennaro; R Girometti; R Ienzi; A Luini; S Manoukian; S Morassutt; D Morrone; J Nori; A Orlacchio; F Pane; P Panzarola; R Ponzone; G Simonetti; P Torricelli; G Valeri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  Perioperative breast MRI is not associated with lower locoregional recurrence rates in DCIS patients treated with or without radiation.

Authors:  Melissa Pilewskie; Cristina Olcese; Anne Eaton; Sujata Patil; Elizabeth Morris; Monica Morrow; Kimberly J Van Zee
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Current Status and New Developments in Breast MRI.

Authors:  Katja C Siegmann; Bernhard Krämer; Claus Claussen
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Sonographic tomography for the preoperative staging of breast cancer prior to surgery.

Authors:  I Grady; H Gorsuch-Rafferty; P Hansen
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2010-07-24

8.  Patient selection for partial breast irradiation by intraoperative radiation therapy: can magnetic resonance imaging be useful?-perspective from radiation oncology point of view.

Authors:  Marco Krengli; Carla Pisani; Letizia Deantonio
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Impact of value based breast cancer care pathway implementation on pre-operative breast magnetic resonance imaging utilization.

Authors:  Devina K S McCray; Stephen R Grobmyer; Holly J Pederson
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

10.  Clinical outcome of magnetic resonance imaging-detected additional lesions in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Gi-Won Ha; Mi Suk Yi; Byoung Kil Lee; Hyun Jo Youn; Sung Hoo Jung
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.