Literature DB >> 15906034

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and sonography in patients receiving primary chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Filippo Montemurro1, Laura Martincich, Giovanni De Rosa, Stefano Cirillo, Vincenzo Marra, Nicoletta Biglia, Marco Gatti, Piero Sismondi, Massimo Aglietta, Daniele Regge.   

Abstract

We compared dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and sonography (US) for monitoring tumour size in 21 patients with breast cancer undergoing primary chemotherapy (PCT) followed by surgery. The correlation between DCE-MRI and US measurements of tumour size, defined as the product of the two major diameters, was 0.555 (P=0.009), 0.782 (P<0.001), and 0.793 (P<0.001) at baseline, and after two and four cycles of PCT, respectively. The median tumour size was significantly larger when measured by DCE-MRI than by US at baseline (1472 vs 900 mm(2), P<0.001) and after two cycles of PCT (600 vs 400 mm(2), P=0.009). After PCT, the median tumour size measured by the two techniques was similar (256 vs 289 mm(2) for DCE-MRI and US, respectively, P=0.859). The correlation with the histopathological major tumour diameter was 0.824 (P<0.001) and 0.705 (P<0.001) for post-treatment DCE-MRI and US, respectively. Measurements of the final major tumour diameter by DCE-MRI tended to be more precise, including cases achieving a pathological complete response. Randomized trials are warranted to establish the clinical impact of the initial discrepancy in tumour size estimates between DCE-MRI and US, and the trend towards a better definition of the final tumour size provided by DCE-MRI in this clinical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15906034     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-2656-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  34 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: primum non nocere.

Authors:  Monica Morrow
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging.

Authors:  L Esserman; N Hylton; L Yassa; J Barclay; S Frankel; E Sickles
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Locally advanced breast carcinoma: evaluation of mammography in the prediction of residual disease after induction chemotherapy.

Authors:  S Huber; M Wagner; I Zuna; M Medl; H Czembirek; S Delorme
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.480

4.  Surgical conservation planning after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and operable stage III breast carcinoma.

Authors:  H M Kuerer; S E Singletary; A U Buzdar; F C Ames; V Valero; T A Buchholz; M I Ross; L Pusztai; G N Hortobagyi; K K Hunt
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Is the "blooming sign" a promising additional tool to determine malignancy in MR mammography?

Authors:  D R Fischer; P Baltzer; A Malich; S Wurdinger; M G Freesmeyer; C Marx; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-09-27       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Clinical and diagnostic value of preoperative MR mammography and FDG-PET in suspicious breast lesions.

Authors:  C Walter; K Scheidhauer; A Scharl; U-J Goering; P Theissen; H Kugel; T Krahe; U Pietrzyk
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-01-23       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonography.

Authors:  Tunetake Hata; Hiromasa Takahashi; Kenichi Watanabe; Masato Takahashi; Kazunori Taguchi; Tomoo Itoh; Satoru Todo
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Relative value of physical examination, mammography, and breast sonography in evaluating the size of the primary tumor and regional lymph node metastases in women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma.

Authors:  J Herrada; R B Iyer; E N Atkinson; N Sneige; A U Buzdar; G N Hortobagyi
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent.

Authors:  C Boetes; R D Mus; R Holland; J O Barentsz; S P Strijk; T Wobbes; J H Hendriks; S H Ruys
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  MR imaging of the breast: indications, established technique, and new directions.

Authors:  F Sardanelli; A Iozzelli; A Fausto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.034

View more
  11 in total

1.  Indications for breast magnetic resonance imaging. Consensus document "Attualità in senologia", Florence 2007.

Authors:  F Sardanelli; G M Giuseppetti; G Canavese; L Cataliotti; S Corcione; E Cossu; M Federico; L Marotti; L Martincich; P Panizza; F Podo; M Rosselli Del Turco; C Zuiani; C Alfano; M Bazzocchi; P Belli; S Bianchi; A Cilotti; M Calabrese; L Carbonaro; L Cortesi; C Di Maggio; A Del Maschio; A Esseridou; A Fausto; M Gennaro; R Girometti; R Ienzi; A Luini; S Manoukian; S Morassutt; D Morrone; J Nori; A Orlacchio; F Pane; P Panzarola; R Ponzone; G Simonetti; P Torricelli; G Valeri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Relationship between DCE-MRI morphological and functional features and histopathological characteristics of breast cancer.

Authors:  Filippo Montemurro; Laura Martincich; Ivana Sarotto; Ilaria Bertotto; Riccardo Ponzone; Lisa Cellini; Stefania Redana; Piero Sismondi; Massimo Aglietta; Daniele Regge
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Functional Tumor Volume by MR Imaging Predicts Recurrence-free Survival-Results from the ACRIN 6657/CALGB 150007 I-SPY 1 TRIAL.

Authors:  Nola M Hylton; Constantine A Gatsonis; Mark A Rosen; Constance D Lehman; David C Newitt; Savannah C Partridge; Wanda K Bernreuter; Etta D Pisano; Elizabeth A Morris; Paul T Weatherall; Sandra M Polin; Gillian M Newstead; Helga S Marques; Laura J Esserman; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  In vivo 1H MRS in the assessment of the therapeutic response of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Uma Sharma; Hyeon Man Baek; Min Ying Su; Naranamangalam R Jagannathan
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 5.  How to use magnetic resonance imaging following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Elissa R Price; Jasmine Wong; Rita Mukhtar; Nola Hylton; Laura J Esserman
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 1.337

6.  Factors affecting the concordance of radiologic and pathologic tumor size in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Ameer Hamza; Sidrah Khawar; Ramen Sakhi; Ahmed Alrajjal; Shelby Miller; Warda Ibrar; Jacob Edens; Sajad Salehi; Daniel Ockner
Journal:  Ultrasound       Date:  2018-10-23

7.  Effect of MR Imaging Contrast Thresholds on Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer Subtypes: A Subgroup Analysis of the ACRIN 6657/I-SPY 1 TRIAL.

Authors:  Wen Li; Vignesh Arasu; David C Newitt; Ella F Jones; Lisa Wilmes; Jessica Gibbs; John Kornak; Bonnie N Joe; Laura J Esserman; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2016-12

8.  Agreement between MRI and pathologic breast tumor size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and comparison with alternative tests: individual patient data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael L Marinovich; Petra Macaskill; Les Irwig; Francesco Sardanelli; Eleftherios Mamounas; Gunter von Minckwitz; Valentina Guarneri; Savannah C Partridge; Frances C Wright; Jae Hyuck Choi; Madhumita Bhattacharyya; Laura Martincich; Eren Yeh; Viviana Londero; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 9.  Meta-analysis of agreement between MRI and pathologic breast tumour size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  M L Marinovich; P Macaskill; L Irwig; F Sardanelli; G von Minckwitz; E Mamounas; M Brennan; S Ciatto; N Houssami
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Impact of MRI Protocol Adherence on Prediction of Pathological Complete Response in the I-SPY 2 Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer Trial.

Authors:  Natsuko Onishi; Wen Li; Jessica Gibbs; Lisa J Wilmes; Alex Nguyen; Ella F Jones; Vignesh Arasu; John Kornak; Bonnie N Joe; Laura J Esserman; David C Newitt; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2020-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.