Literature DB >> 17289778

Visually guided reaching depends on motion area MT+.

David Whitney1, Amanda Ellison, Nichola J Rice, Derek Arnold, Melvyn Goodale, Vincent Walsh, David Milner.   

Abstract

Visual information is crucial for goal-directed reaching. A number of studies have recently shown that motion in particular is an important source of information for the visuomotor system. For example, when reaching a stationary object, movement of the background can influence the trajectory of the hand, even when the background motion is irrelevant to the object and task. This manual following response may be a compensatory response to changes in body position, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Here we tested whether visual motion area MT+ is necessary to generate the manual following response. We found that stimulation of MT+ with transcranial magnetic stimulation significantly reduced a strong manual following response. MT+ is therefore necessary for generating the manual following response, indicating that it plays a crucial role in guiding goal-directed reaching movements by taking into account background motion in scenes.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17289778      PMCID: PMC3849415          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhl172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  62 in total

1.  Can a motion-blind patient reach for moving objects?

Authors:  T Schenk; N Mai; J Ditterich; J Zihl
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Motion-sensitive neurones in V5/MT modulate perceived spatial position.

Authors:  Paul V McGraw; Vincent Walsh; Brendan T Barrett
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Shorter latencies for motion trajectories than for flashes in population responses of cat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Dirk Jancke; Wolfram Erlhagen; Gregor Schöner; Hubert R Dinse
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-02-20       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The effect of a moving background on aimed hand movements.

Authors:  H Mohrmann-Lendla; A G Fleischer
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Shifts in perceived position following adaptation to visual motion.

Authors:  R J Snowden
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-12-03       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Smooth-pursuit initiation in the presence of a textured background in monkey.

Authors:  E L Keller; N S Khan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Short-latency ocular following responses of monkey. I. Dependence on temporospatial properties of visual input.

Authors:  F A Miles; K Kawano; L M Optican
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Effects of stationary and moving textured backgrounds on the visuo-oculo-manual tracking in humans.

Authors:  G Masson; L Proteau; D R Mestre
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque.

Authors:  T D Albright
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Effects of an optokinetic background on pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  R D Yee; S A Daniels; O W Jones; R W Baloh; V Honrubia
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  15 in total

1.  The perceived position of moving objects: transcranial magnetic stimulation of area MT+ reduces the flash-lag effect.

Authors:  Gerrit W Maus; Jamie Ward; Romi Nijhawan; David Whitney
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Human MST but not MT responds to tactile stimulation.

Authors:  Michael S Beauchamp; Nafi E Yasar; Neel Kishan; Tony Ro
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  The influence of motion signals in hand movements.

Authors:  Borja Rodríguez-Herreros; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Grasping with the Press of a Button: Grasp-selective Responses in the Human Anterior Intraparietal Sulcus Depend on Nonarbitrary Causal Relationships between Hand Movements and End-effector Actions.

Authors:  Scott H Frey; Marc Hansen; Noah Marchal
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Visual Cortical Area MT Is Required for Development of the Dorsal Stream and Associated Visuomotor Behaviors.

Authors:  William C Kwan; Chia-Kang Chang; Hsin-Hao Yu; Inaki C Mundinano; Dylan M Fox; Jihane Homman-Ludiye; James A Bourne
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Global motion perception is related to motor function in 4.5-year-old children born at risk of abnormal development.

Authors:  Arijit Chakraborty; Nicola S Anstice; Robert J Jacobs; Nabin Paudel; Linda L LaGasse; Barry M Lester; Christopher J D McKinlay; Jane E Harding; Trecia A Wouldes; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Distributed representation of single touches in somatosensory and visual cortex.

Authors:  Michael S Beauchamp; Stephen Laconte; Nafi Yasar
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Effects of roll visual motion on online control of arm movement: reaching within a dynamic virtual environment.

Authors:  Assaf Y Dvorkin; Robert V Kenyon; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Motion-dependent representation of space in area MT+.

Authors:  Gerrit W Maus; Jason Fischer; David Whitney
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Dissociation of extrastriate body and biological-motion selective areas by manipulation of visual-motor congruency.

Authors:  Ioannis Kontaris; Alison J Wiggett; Paul E Downing
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.