Literature DB >> 2323388

The coupling of arm and finger movements during prehension.

Y Paulignan1, C MacKenzie, R Marteniuk, M Jeannerod.   

Abstract

The experiments reported here were aimed at testing the degree of coupling of motor components during the act of prehension. Hand movements were recorded bidimensionnally by a Selspot system which monitored the displacement of IREDS placed at the thumb and index finger tips, at the metacarpophalangeal joint of the index and at the radial styloid. Targets were three-dimensional translucent dowels placed concentrically at 30 cm from the subject. The dowels were 10 degrees apart from each other. In blocked and control trials, one dowel was illuminated and served as a target for the movement. In the perturbed trials (20% of cases) one dowel was illuminated first and the light was unexpectedly shifted to another dowel at the onset of the subject's movements. Kinematic analysis of the movement revealed the following: 1. In blocked and control trials, the wrist moved with a single acceleration to the target dowel. Meanwhile, the finger grip (computed as the distance between thumb and index IREDS) increased up to a maximum size, located in time at about 60% of movement time and then decreased until contact with the dowel. 2. In perturbed trials the initial wrist acceleration was aborted. A new acceleration started about 180 ms after the first, in order to reorient the hand to the new target. Similarly, the initial grip aperture also aborted and reincreased in synchrony with the second wrist acceleration. 3. Perturbations increased movement time by only 95 ms on average. The first peak in acceleration indicating abortion of the initial movement occurred 100 ms after the movement onset, i.e., 30 ms earlier than in non perturbed trials.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2323388     DOI: 10.1007/bf00608255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  7 in total

1.  The timing of natural prehension movements.

Authors:  M Jeannerod
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement.

Authors:  M A Goodale; D Pelisson; C Prablanc
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Apr 24-30       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb. II. Evidence of fast unconscious processes correcting the trajectory of the hand to the final position of a double-step stimulus.

Authors:  D Pélisson; C Prablanc; M A Goodale; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Coordination of three-joint digit movements for rapid finger-thumb grasp.

Authors:  K J Cole; J H Abbs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The formation of finger grip during prehension. A cortically mediated visuomotor pattern.

Authors:  M Jeannerod
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Spatial control of arm movements.

Authors:  P Morasso
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Preparation for grasping an object: a developmental study.

Authors:  C von Hofsten; L Rönnqvist
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.332

  7 in total
  24 in total

1.  Compensatory motor control after stroke: an alternative joint strategy for object-dependent shaping of hand posture.

Authors:  Preeti Raghavan; Marco Santello; Andrew M Gordon; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The influence of visual motion on fast reaching movements to a stationary object.

Authors:  David Whitney; David A Westwood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Motor control of voluntary arm movements. Kinematic and modelling study.

Authors:  M L Corradini; M Gentilucci; T Leo; G Rizzolatti
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  Oral hapsis guides accurate hand preshaping for grasping food targets in the mouth.

Authors:  Jenni M Karl; Lori-Ann R Sacrey; Jon B Doan; Ian Q Whishaw
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 1. The effects of changing object position.

Authors:  Y Paulignan; C MacKenzie; R Marteniuk; M Jeannerod
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Spatiotemporal distribution of location and object effects in reach-to-grasp kinematics.

Authors:  Adam G Rouse; Marc H Schieber
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Grip forces during fast point-to-point and continuous hand movements.

Authors:  Paolo Viviani; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Coordination and concurrency in bimanual rotation tasks when moving away from and toward the body.

Authors:  A H Mason; P J Bryden
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The preparation and control of reversal movements as a single unit of action.

Authors:  Michael A Khan; Luc Tremblay; Darian T Cheng; Marlene Luis; Stuart J Mourton
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements. 2. The effects of changing object size.

Authors:  Y Paulignan; M Jeannerod; C MacKenzie; R Marteniuk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.